Going along with MW's way of looking at things, lets not forget how the Price Anderson Act subsidizes nuclear energy. Price Anderson limits liability in a nuclear accident to (the last time I checked) $560 million per occurrence. Without Price Anderson, no nuclear plant could obtain insurance -- and no one would dare operate one. Price Anderson in effect transfers the cost of accident risk, from the operators (and electricity consumers) to the residents and property owners near the plant.

The pure economic approach to this mess would be, to price all forms of energy so that they reflect all the external costs (pollution, accident risk, decommissioning, military and strategic costs) as well the "internal" production costs. I don't know if that is the best approach (though it sure would be an improvement over what we have now); I do know that it probably won't happen either.

Price-Anderson says more about the state of American tort law than about commercial nuclear power safety.

Consider the ridiculous trial settlements for trivial items that have been in the news the last few years.  A cagey lawyer could get a huge settlement on punitive damages alone.  Without Price-Anderson, the corporations involved are playing "you-bet-your-company."  The lack of something similar to Price-Anderson in China is retarding their nuclear power industry.  In the mean time, they just burn more coal.  Note that you can't get insurance for war or civil insurrection either.

It is worthwhile noting that the government has not paid out a single penny under Price-Anderson in its decades of existence.  The industry does maintain a very substantial amount of private insurance and regularly gets full refund of its premiums.

And the risk is not transferred to the locals but to the Federal government.  It is vaguely like our response to Katrina and the failure of the federally funded levees.  When a problem is too big, the larger society as a whole has to step in. The benefits of nuclear power to the US are manifold - lower pollution, reduced imports of oil, stable and low electricity prices, etc.  

It has been a darn good bet so far.