It might be nice if just for once someone used the space program instead of computers as their technology referent.  After a half century of development, it's just gotten more expensive and more complicated.  Or look at medical science, for pete's sake.  You don't get the result you like just because you want it a lot.
  This artticle is just more King Canute. It struck me as another example of someone trying to spin reality away.  Without magic markets and magic technology the Wired way of life would be doomed; no one is going to be interested in wrist computers, Google Universe and AI when you can't heat a house.  Therefore if you say it can't happen often enough then it won't.
I have to agree. We spend lots and lots of money on rocket engineering and we still can't beat three solids and a pressure fed for getting off the planet. Hydrogen, liquid fuel bipropellant, liquid oxygen, etc, are simply not cost drivers. Three solid fuel rockets in a stack and a pressure fed for regularizing the orbit is still the way to go. All the fancy accounting they use to persuade us that Ariane and the Shuttle are cost effective is not going to change the fact that their budgets are still way too high for the prices they qoute.
In fifty years we have made no progress. That's when the Scout program started up.