<Perhaps the UK is getting the message The Oil Drum About that savior technology . . .>

35 comments on Jim Cramer: "The Simmons Argument is Right..."

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version

step back on September 9, 2005 - 5:09pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Cramer screams and rants. Why do you find his "sound logic" persuasive? --about anything?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Prof. Goose on September 9, 2005 - 9:08pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Oh, come on SB.  You of the unconventional approach to communication trying to criticize someone (who happens to know the markets well and is seemingly convinced of developments with regard to petroleum) on his approach to communication...?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
step back on September 10, 2005 - 9:33am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Defense: I'm one who says the "general public" responds to "sound" logic. Folk at TOD should be well beyond falling for that kind of junk science. Cramer claims that he is "MAD" and that is why the public should listen to him. Given that his show is still on the air, one has to assume he has attracted a sufficiently large group of viewers who are eager to listen to the MAD man and his screams, and to accept those rants as being credible (or entertaining) simply because of the way he intonates his rants.
Comments can no longer be added to this story.

35 comments on Jim Cramer: "The Simmons Argument is Right..."

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version