"Economics (markets) and technology will always save us"

Huh?  Who believes this?  I'm one of the decoder-ring-wearing members of the Economists Club hereabouts, and *I* sure as hell don't believe it.  You can find people who say that markets will save us this time, but I doubt you can find anyone with more than 3 gray cells to rub together who says literally that markets "will always save us".

But that nit aside, I think the only rational way to look at our situation is to take the biggest view possible.  That means recognizing the absolute limits dictated by geology, plus the contributions of technological advancement, markets (meaning economics and market psychology), and public policy.  Dismissing any one of those four is a recipe for error.

But I think you've got it exactly right about why R&D is so low.  Honestly, does anyone think it's a coincidence that almost all parts of the worldwide infrastructure are stretched tight as a piano wire, all at the same time?  If the oil industry decision makers didn't know what was coming you'd expect to see one major bottleneck, not the series of them we have now.

IMO, this is a good thing, as it causes the onset of higher prices a little earlier, and will actually soften the blow by delaying the peak and accelerating the transition away from oil.  Will it be enough of an effect to make a major difference and save us from some human and economic pain?  Who the heck knows, but I prefer our chances with the early price rise to our chances without it.

Well, Lou, I had in mind "Freakonomics" author Steve Levitt and technology evangelist Michael Lynch and others (Yergin) who I have read...

Not you....
Also, I have both a Greenspan secret decoder ring and also, I believe, a Yergin secret decoder ring at this point ... don't screw with me :)
And specifically, these kind of "disruptions" mean that the peak is smoothed out. The ideal situation is that much mitigation is began so far in advance to render the peak a non-event. Unfortunately that doesn't look like its going to be the case (and frankly it seems like we need the wake up call to deal with some other pressing issues-like how much we're screwing up the ecosystem), but the slower the depletion rate, the better off we'll be as far as societal collapse goes (the poor will suffer more of course...). I must point out I'm taking this excellent analysis from an article posted here titled "4%, 11% who cares" several days ago.
http://alteng.blogspot.com/

"In reality, Peak oil will be a non-event. As oil becomes more expensive, new technologies will compete with oil and naturally replace it in our economy."