150 comments on Friday open thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
150 comments on Friday open thread
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Thanksgiving Open Campfire Thread
- How Relocalization Worked
- How to Set Up and Run a Bicycle Repair Company
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“This order [i.e. capitalism] is now bound to the technical and economic conditions of machine production which today determine the lives of all the individuals who are born into this mechanism, not only those directly concerned with the economic acquisition, with irresistible force. Perhaps it will so determine them until the last ton of fossilized coal is burnt.”
—Max Weber, 1905
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
It is obvious we are at Peak. I'm eager to learn how long the world will be able to maintain the bumpy plateau of peak production? Any suggestions anyone? Stuart?
That's because to me timing is of utmost importance.
Since reading TOD I've been eager to answer Bob Shaw, in Phoenix, Arizona: Individually, yes, people are smarter than yeast. More brains enabling them to alter circumstances. Collectively I'm affraid they are not.
Thanks to you all.
Paulus from Holland
But there is something you have to realise, economic impact is felt as soon as demand shots up above suply. So when you're on a plateau you're not coping with demand and prices will rise, like now. The moment production will decline prices will already be higher, they will just climb faster.
My best guess (using that 8% decline for major oil fields) is that during 2007 Saudi Arabi and FSU won't be able to fill the gap to the decline in the rest of the World - and that's it.
If Iran cuts production, or if like prof. Bahktiari says the decline rates are much higher than what we might think a decline will probaly be felt still this year.
And demand is projected to go beyond 87 MBD by the end of the year...
I don't pretend to guess at the economics, but here's one thought on renewables. If we're getting both Peak Oil, and Global Climate Change at the same time, then I'd say we ought to prepare for some more great (ie, REALLY great, TOO great) opportunities in wind energy. Of course, weather events 'might' be heavier, but would almost certainly be less predictable, too. You'd need equipment that could protect itself during excessive conditions.
There's a Finnish site www.windside.com with a Vertical-Axis windmill that seems to be better suited for really heavy weather..
The wind crowd seems down on Verticals for their efficiency, but if you get cheaper engineering (lower towers, reduced Gyroscopic stresses) and more durability, the numbers might be better. Also takes better advantage of smaller winds and quick directional changes, as it doesn't lose time aiming into a new source..
(And did Bush really say Nuclear was a Renewable today? Maybe it was a replay of an older speech, but I don't know if that is funnier than their calling it 'Clean'.. the fuel-waste that can poison us for more millenia than we've had agriculture)
IMO, other types of WTs may one day fill certain niches (sites on islands, sites with low wind conditions or gusty, high wind conditions), but if we ever get 50% of our electricity from wind, well over 90% of the WTs will be the Danish model.
Perhaps non-engineering reasons affected the development of the Danish model over all others, but I think that was a minor and not a major force in the evolution of wind turbines. After all, the other models got LOTS of Gov't R&D put into their approaches, the Danes did not. The market forced the evolution of Danish WTs simply because they worked and the next larger size worked a bit better..
The Danes (and their copies) work today and make money. The others do not, yet.
Then the Danes found knowledge where it could be found and subsidized building of wind turbines that then grew in the local subsidized competition. Since other countriels also started to subsidize wind power it grew into a large export industry for the Danes.
Subsidizing of wind power started later in Sweden and it was smaller. It now depends of forcing everybody to buy a percentage of "green" power. Myself I do not like it, I bought 100% nuclear power when I got a chance to make a microscopic statement with my power bill, I find this "green" to be as good as the "greens green".
The ammount of money spent on different kinds of energy research in Sweden following the peak ;) in the local nuclear power debate is about the same as the cost of a full scale nuclear reactor. A little of it has yielded practical results that are being used, its very hard to figure out how usefull it has been. The debate and research has probably led to more energy efficient building code, better energy efficiency in some industries and a lot more biomass heating then would have been strictly short term economical. But I am only guessing based on how I view things.
That is not so obvious. You need at least 4-5 years of flat or declining production to confirm Peak Oil is here.
>how long the world will be able to maintain the bumpy plateau of peak production?
IMO many many many years. The consequences will be 1) permanent process of reallocation of leftover oil resources: less on individual transportation, more on mass transit and chemical production 2) more oil substitutes will come 3) more technical inventions in auto industry etc. (you name it)
In sum: new stage of technological revolution.
I joked in other thread about removal of Dutch guys to Antarctica after Holland will be drowned. Don't take offence. I like Dutch guys :)
Andrei, 3500 km to Moscow.