The Oil Drum | Critiquing the 2006 Megaprojects report

148 comments on Critiquing the 2006 Megaprojects report

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version

louGrinzo on April 6, 2006 - 9:47am

If you have proof, present it. If not, you owe Chris S. a public apology.

And no, a change in the megaprojects report does not count as proof.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

Nate Hagens on April 6, 2006 - 10:07am

Lou-
I was using 'tongue and cheek' commentary method.
-Squatch

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

louGrinzo on April 6, 2006 - 1:07pm

Then please make it more obvious that you're being sarcastic or humorous or whatever. I have zero problem with humor, even the really edgy kind (as often seen over at dailyKos), but it has to be obvious that it IS humor for it to work.

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

sr on April 6, 2006 - 4:01pm

It was obvious to me. Maybe you need a special icon to indicate irony to you, but --- wait, is English your native language?

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

148 comments on Critiquing the 2006 Megaprojects report

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

| Show without comments | PDF version

Search The Oil Drum with Google

Support The Oil Drum

Click the button to learn about supporting The Oil Drum with a secure donation.

Peak Oil Primers

Beware email scams!

Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.

“What people need to hear loud and clear is that we're running out of energy in America.”

—George W. Bush, May 2001