![]() | Modeling Oil Depletion Using EIA Data - The Tiger Chasing its Tail? | The Oil Drum | DrumBeat: June 14, 2006 | ![]() |
40 comments on Goldman Likes Wind. The Kennedys and DoD Don't?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
40 comments on Goldman Likes Wind. The Kennedys and DoD Don't?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search
Blogroll
NY Blogs
- Gothamist
- Starts & Fits
- Aaron Naparstek
- Baloghblog
- One Atlantic
- bikeblog
- Curbed
- Urban Digs
- OnNYTurf
- Daily Gotham
- StreetsBlog
Local Organizations
- NYC Peak Oil Meet-up
- Peak Oil NYC
- Transportation Alternatives
- Time's Up
- Straphanger's Campaign
- Regional Plan Association
- Green Homes NYC
- Tri-State Transportation Campaign
- Harbor Rail Tunnel
- Auto Free NY
- Walk NY
- Bridge Tolls Advocacy
- Vision 42nd Street
- Car Free
- Right of Way
- Upper Green Side
Local Media
National Peak Oil Sites
Webrings
|
|
|
|
User login
Personnel
Classic posts
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
The Oil Drum: New York City archives
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
There is great consensus that wind is a viable, patriotic option to importing mideastern oil. Ten years ago the pundits said wind wouldn't be viable, 5 years ago the coorporate money thought only a few places would be profitable. Now, with high energy prices every wind turbine is making money and careful site selection has enabled very large wind farms to produce electricity almost round the clock with little impact on the environment. The big wind farms are sited in corn fields and they farm right around them. This fosters multi use and multiple income streams for land owners. This is not an intermittant energy source like a little fan on your roof. These turbines are out in the open up high where the wind always blows. Pretty much as many alternative energy people visualized 30 years ago.
Now rich people and the government are getting concerned about the view, radar coverage and bird deaths? Give me a break. These turbines are in lots of small town in Iowa and the ground is not littered with dead birds all around them. The towers are shorter than many smokestack and definately shorter than 100 story buildings. Ugliness is in the eye of the beholder and even minimum cooperation between groups will solve the radar interferance issues.
This is a fight over who has power. A small number of rich, influential people or the general communitay at large. In the town I live in there is a raging debate about Smart Growth vs conventional growth. The conventional Growth crowd label Smart Growth as 'No growth' because Smart Growth disagrees with unrestricted mall and housing development. At the same time the Conventional Growth people are very anti alternative energy installation and approaches. They strongly dislike any ordinance or code that raises the bar on energy efficiency, in ground heat pumps, passive solar design, energy efficient appliances in new homes, etc. These are all considered to restrictive "Government can't tell me where or what to build, it's a free country" is often cited.
Now this same mindset is preventing one of the greenest energy sources from being developed creating jobs and improving local economies. We live in strange times indeed.
Let's put a coal plant right next to Kennedy's estate and see whether or not he'd rather have a few wind generators off his precious coast.