I keep wondering why the MSM continues to seek out Yergin's opinions when they are constantly proving to be false.  Same with Steve Forbes.  I said in an earlier writing here in TOD that I'd rather trust my own instincts than listen to these charlatans.  And guess what?  I am consistently proving myself correct.  They are consistently wrong.  Imagine that!

 

I think it's as simple as these guys having the time and money to be available for TV.  How many people can be a "reliable guest" ready to hop on a plane?
odograph -

Indeed, the mainstream media (and I've noticed this particularly on the Lehrer Report0 appears to have a more or less fixed stable of 'experts' on various topics that they draw upon to comment on various news developments as the need arises.

As best I can tell, the main criteria for becoming such a TV expert is i) experience in a high-visibility position in either government or academia, ii) being articulate and reasonably photogenic on TV, and iii) a committment not to say anything too extreme or too divergent from the current 'received wisdom'.

When there is a panel of such people, the atmosphere is generally very chummy, with very little open discord. I recall one rather well-regarded military expert who was on the Lehrer Report during the early days of the Iraq occupation. He said something that went totally against the grain of the other experts and did so quite vehemently. I have not seen him back on the program since.

When looking at this issue, the only thing you need to know is that, first and foremost, TV is entertainment.

In Hindi, a "pandit" is someone who has learned and memorized the Rig Vedas and Upanishads well enough that he can be called upon to recite the right sections for weddings, funerals, et cetera.

Hence the modern expression "pundit." Yergin is the best example of a mass media pundit, but if you'll pardon a ribald touch, it seems to me the book he recites from is the Kama Sutra.

I guess the real question then is : who is getting "screwed"
Yergin wrote a fairly competent work of popular history, then decided it could be turned into a franchise which would make him money with no thought.
Forbes seems to be good for absolutely nothing.
Ah, c'mon. The Forbes name has been associated with big money for decades.

How do you get filthy rich ? Ya gotta "climb every Malcom, Forbes every stream....."

LOL, when Santa Claus makes himself available for interview the media will jump at it, they would be silly not to. It keeps the children happy, even if the older ones know it's a sham.

Besides, if the MSM saw the reality that you and I foresee, they would know their days are numbered and have to rush to the toilet.