<No conclusions, just the January numbers and some concernThe Oil DrumAnd Saudi Arabia had an answer . . .>

148 comments on Wednesday's Open Thread

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

pianoguy on February 8, 2006 - 8:04pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
LevinK - You're right strictly with regard to $$$, but there are a lot of differences between Prius and Echo besides mpg. The Prius has much more cargo space, more passenger space, better performance, many more bells and whistles and is much, MUCH safer. (For instance, you can't get stability control on the Echo.) Those features account for most of the $10k. Tax breaks may account for most or even all of the rest. (In Colorado, for instance, you could conceivably get $7k back in state and federal credits.)

For those who want their hybrids cheap as well as fuel-efficient, the Kia Rio hybrid is scheduled to be released late this year. I wonder how it will be received. The economic challenge is that the cost of the hybrid drive is basically the same whether the car is an econobox or mid-priced sedan, so, from the consumer standpoint, the hybrid premium actually increases on cheaper cars: The difference between $11k and $14k (27% increase) is more likely to deter a potential buyer than the difference between $21k and $24k (14% increase).

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
LevinK on February 8, 2006 - 11:14pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Ok, I should have picked something closer to its class like the 2005 Corolla (35 mpg, real world).

Actually I think that hybrids are great. I am mostly frustrated that we do not move faster in the direction of plug-ins, which would already represent a qualitevely different step in the right direction.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Mad Maxout on February 9, 2006 - 9:09pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
I just last week bought a 2001 Kia Rio (4-banger and not hybrid) and after a week of use, I logged 185 miles before loading my second load of fuel onboard. When I bought it I topped off the tank. After the 185 miles, I needed only 6.9 gallons to top the tank again - 26 miles per gallon. Not bad for a 5 year old car. I drive a mix of city and freeway miles, so it's all-around mpg.

The easiest way to measure gas mileage is the way I describe above. At 7 gallons per week, that's one gallon a day. I wonder if it can burn E-85 right. It would be a lot better to feed alcohol distilleries than terrorists! If I used E-85 instead, the terrorists would get only one gallon/week's worth of my "donation".

I bought the car becuse a bus I would ride otherwise started carrying an idiot who hated me for no obvious reason and had no bones about letting me know. Since transit must cater to ANYONE, undesireables get to board buses and trains. Something missed by transit boosters. And in Israel, transit is known to pick up suicide bombers, meaning buses are targets. And trains are too tempting for any smallpoxer.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Oil CEO on February 9, 2006 - 11:43pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
This is an interesting post. I'm not sure how to respond and probably shouldn't - but, will anyway.

If everybody thought the way do(and don't take this personally, because I've read some of your other stuff and am generally impressed) - and I don't know how else to say this - but, we would have hit peak oil 50 years ago.

People do, in fact, make decisions based on a broad variety of factors, some concious, some not. However buying a car to travel alone and burn even more gas because some guy looked at you the wrong way. Boy, that's the spirit. Did you consider shooting him?

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Mad Maxout on February 10, 2006 - 12:13am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
No, but I figured that an altercation was high probability. The train station is not bristling with cameras to help catch idiots after the fact. The problem is that more people are riding that bus, making competition for what few seats there are - and I'm better at competing for the seats than the bully. Meanwhile the bus agency buys buses with fewer seats(!) making for increased chance of a "bus rage" altercation.

Worse, the bus agency buys buses of such poor quality that you'd think they bought them from Wal-Mart. The back door is so drafty that it can't hold HVAC, meaning it's A/C'd in winter and heated in summer. And the seats are like a La-Z-Boy chair with springs and cushions and a suspension comparable to the axles welded to the frame. It's like riding in a storm chasing plane unless the road is literally smooth as glass.

I was considering a motorcycle before the bully emerged to make the long unpleasant commute that much worse. The buses are found in Chicago's suburbs (pacebus.com) and that agency makes the CTA look good by comparison. Let the bully harass someone else. I don't need a "yellow school bus effect" along with bouncing like a lotto ball every time the bus hits a pebble. I couldn't wait before I took motorcycle lessons once the idiot emerged.

You ask a (very) good question, and that's my answer.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Oil CEO on February 10, 2006 - 12:27am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
You are funny. But you raise another question. Which are worse - terrorists or idiots?
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
step back on February 10, 2006 - 11:45am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Worst of all are the bean-counting bureaucrats who don't provide enough buses with enough seats for the needs of the people.

The needs of the bureaucrats outweigh the needs of the many --Spock.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Mad Maxout on February 10, 2006 - 10:16pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Good question, and I will answer. Terrorists are (fortunately) rare, but idiots are exceedingly common. That includes the bean-counters who ordered the buses to set the stage for the bully idiot and of course the bully idiot who drove me to drive. Idiots incluse rick idiots like Steve Fossett who with his money bought an "experimental" plane to joyride around the world AND purposely overshoot just to get in the world record book. I get one consolation: Steve Fossett while "driving" over India encountered heavy turbulence, so he had a chance to expierence what it's like to ride a PACE Bus. Just like me, as he shook in his "drivers seat" like I would in an ordinary seat.

Fun note. I occasionally do Flight Simulator and always had some interest in aviation, though for non-noble reasons. Due to this interest, I often mix aviation and automotive stuff together. (like a "load of fuel" and "tank of gas") I do see a terror danger in DISGRUNTLED PILOTS becuse they are well-trained (and expierenced) who could, in theory, pop a copilot then put the flaps back up as the plane rolls to barely take off to hit the airline headquarters building a la 9/11. This would take only seconds and be unstoppable and only take a patient pilot to fly out of the wrong airport on the wrong runway. (only obvious to a flight sim player)

Since idiots are way more common than terrorists, this is a bigger hazard all around. We can see idiots as we drive. The "disgruntled pilot" hazard has precedent with an EgyptAir pilot and of course the disgruntled postal workers, and suicide gunmen unconnected with any terrorist group. Idiots become "independant operatives".

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Oil CEO on February 11, 2006 - 1:41am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
I apologize. I underestimated you. What I thought was funny is actually a certain profound realism. BTW, I don't know where you came up with your name, but the first 10 minutes of (the original)Mad Max is some of the best film-making (and driving)ever.
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
tom deplume on February 10, 2006 - 3:38pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Two points
I bought a Kia Sephia in '99 and get similar mpg.
Did you complain to the transit systems management about the problem passenger?  The system I worked for could ban passengers who were repeatedly causing trouble. ADA does not protect trouble makers.
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Mad Maxout on February 10, 2006 - 10:30pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Good question with answer. I was not patient to deal with idiots in management when I decided to buy and use a car. Why? Becuse my entire expierence with authorities and bullies dictates that they will ignore me. The ONLY effective strategy I ever found was to avoid a bully, seemingly by any means necessary short of violence. (violence is counter-productive as it exposes you to worse bullies!)

The alternative to the bully was to wait for the next bus which would be the EXACT same vehicle, but with worse crowding. I have gone to a PACE public hearing before this problem, knowing that things wouldn't change. I spoke up about the other problems (not bully-related) and noted I only had a chance to perform as a comedian. Not good. The 3 execs/stooges are nearly unreachable - certainly without a car. (ironic, eh?)

The problem with the suburban bus system is that the management knows that the ONLY alternative is to do what I did, drive. The bully merely was that tipping point that got me to say "F%&k it" and proceed to drive. My conclusion is that mass transit and our suburbs are a very poor match, on a par with drinking and driving. :(

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
mikey on February 10, 2006 - 10:59pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
here's a story about crazy people on buses.

i was visiting L.A. a few years ago for a conference. i had taken super shuttle from the airport on arriving, but during my stay i figured out that for the return trip i could take a bus from near my hotel to the airport for real cheap. i didn't really need to save the money (was getting reimbursed anyway) but felt inclined to take the bus anyway. (i was poor years ago and certain habits linger.)

but at dinner w/ a bunch of folks somehow this came up and a guy there urged me not to do it. he said he'd lived in L.A. for like twenty years and could tell me with authority that the buses were a bad situation. crazy people, dirty, smelly, scarey people. he said, it's not like in the movie "speed" where the bus driver knows people by name and everyone is nice and clean cut and normal. he was quite clear about the risks of taking the bus and seemed to know what he was talking about.

okay so i figured i'd do it anyway. smelly people, big deal, right? so i took the bus to the airport on the morning of my return.

guess what? everyone on there was well dressed, freshly shampooed, normal, and not crazy. the bus driver knew people by name, and even had a discussion with one regular passenger about another who hadn't been seen lately. i mean, i figured the guy who warned me might have been exaggerating a little, but to find out that he was just totally, utterly wrong in every detail -- that was surprise!

the funny thing was, he didn't actually take the bus (he told me). he just "knew" these things from living in L.A.

(not casting doubt on your particular bully story.)

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Mad Maxout on February 13, 2006 - 11:23pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Ironically, it was the very familiarity of the same people on the Pace bus each day, and all low-income enough to be deterred from driving. While high-income yuppie crowds can harbour bullies (they become managers), lower income groups have their share. One just started using the bus and after a month of the stupidity, I had to act.

Bullies aside, the suburban bus system by Chicago could use a lot of improvement. But with the economics being like a monopoly with a greatly costlier alternative, it is shoddy at best - and non-existent as the norm.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.