<Econbrowser: MC on gas taxes and the president's plan...The Oil DrumWhat the right hand giveth . . . .>

174 comments on Living in the Eemian

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

oilaholic on February 20, 2006 - 12:25pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Could be a recession just based on normal cyclicality of the economy, Fed tightening, housing bust, etc.  But the  question I raise is whether, as I predict, the feedback mechanism of a PO-generated recession will cause oil demand to drop to well below the available supply, leaving room for a subsequent (mild and limited) expansion - the net result being a far greater time horizon for the world to adjust to PO.  The real bottom line: no doomsday scenario - just a long hard slog until we reach a new equilibrium economy based on much much less use of fossil fuels.
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
TJ on February 20, 2006 - 1:18pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Stuart took a whack at this in a post a couple of months ago.  His conclusion is that if the decline in oil is about 4% or less, the economy will remain stable and maybe grow a little in the future.  Anything more and we're SOL, probably for a long time.
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
oilaholic on February 20, 2006 - 4:02pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
It makes sense that the whole issue would be dependent on the rate of decline in oil available to the "free" market, post PO. My assumption is that it will be fairly mild for quite a few years.  That might change dramaticly if certain exporters decide it's in their best interest to husband their inventory.   In any case, I'd love to read Stuart's analysis.  Does anyone have link?  Thanks.
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Stuart Staniford on February 20, 2006 - 5:26pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Relevant would be:

4%, 11%, Who the Hell Cares?

and

Hubbert Theory says Peak is Slow Squeeze

and

Extrapolating World Production

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
TrueKaiser on February 20, 2006 - 6:59pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
that information is nice to know and is needed.
but
you still need to take into account human behavior.

Basically the amount of decline is academic if all that is needed to trigger resource wars and other types of despair is the fact that it is declining no matter what you can do.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Stuart Staniford on February 20, 2006 - 8:19pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
I agree geopolitics of one and kind another are the main uncertainties. But we at least have some degree choice about that...
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Agric on February 21, 2006 - 12:32am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
Free choice, free will, the fixedness or malleability of the future? Is there any way of knowing?

Is choice real or illusion, does it matter? Perhaps geopolitical events are the consequence of build up of tensions and imbalances. Maybe we are just looking in the wrong direction?

Are geopolitical events merely the expression of a more underlying reality.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.