Are we sure that the missing oil was actually produced?  One thing that came to mind is that it could be an indicator that production is lower than it was claimed to be.
Yes, I think that's what Simmons is saying.  He's saying the data is bad, not that people are hoarding oil or anything.  Just that the data cannot be trusted.

The margin of error may be relatively small, but it will be more and more critical as we approach crunch time.

The margin of error may be relatively small-good call, Leanan

I still claim that nothing prevents us from nailing a good macro understanding using nothing more than an expected value for a typical reserve growth model or creaming curve. I assert that the two curves basically amount to the same thing; in particular when we apply the numbers in a statistically valid way to the oil shock model, either one fits nicely into the maturation phase.-Mobjectivist.

Stochastic Resonance asserts itself as "thermostats", feedback
loops fail iniating cascade.

Using an ocean-atmosphere climate model we demonstrate that stochastic resonance could be an important
mechanism for millennial-scale climate variability during glacial times. We propose that the
glacial ocean circulation, unlike today's, was an excitable system with a stable and a weakly unstable
mode of operation, and that a combination of weak periodic forcing and plausible-amplitude stochastic
fluctuations of the freshwater flux into the northern North Atlantic can produce glacial warm events similar
in time evolution, amplitude, spatial pattern, and interspike intervals to those found in the observed climate records.

www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/ Publications/Journals/stochres.pdf

The first major US city to collapse, New Orleans, is evidence of how this works.

As a Self Organizing Critical(SOC), System the mechanism for
abrupt change in oil production would be identical.

...stochastic resonance (SR) has become very popular in many fields of natural science as a paradigm which epitomizes noise-controlled onset of order in a complex system.
Although in the recent literature the notion of SR gained broader significance, the archetype of SR models is represented by a simple symmetric bistable process x(t) driven by both an additive random noise, for simplicity, white and gaussian, and an external sinusoidal bias. On keeping the forcing amplitude and frequency fixed, the amplitude of the periodic component of the process, x, grows sharply with the noise intensity until it reaches a maximum and, then, decreases slowly according to a certain power-law.
It was initially suggested that such a behavior results from the attuning of a deterministic with a stochastic time scale, that is, the forcing period To and the switching time T(D) of the un-biased bistable process x(t), respectively.

It has been said here on TOD that estimates of World Oil Production are fuzzy.

But as usage of oil increases to max levels, exactness becomes critical.
Just when we need it, we don't have it.

In other words, we'll know exactly how much oil we're pumping only when our most critical function sucks air or our least critical function fails and cascades.

James

An article on EnergyBulletin 26th February 2006 may explain much of the missing barrels:
http://energybulletin.net/13199.html

Apparently the US military used 144 million barrels in 2004 = 395,000 barrels per day, almost as much as daily energy consumption of Greece.


Did Saudi Arabia and the UAE report that fuel as export? Did the US report it as import? Was it counted as Saudi or UAE domestic consumption? Or Was it counted as the US consumption?

I am afraid the answers to those three questions are No, No, No and No!

But that amount was surely counted in production.

My experience with international oil statistics tell me that the US military oil consumption overseas disappears in world oil demand. Hence, demand is understated at least that much.

Is about 350 000 barrel per day missing oil demand important?