another pretty picture:

I still am waiting for real answers to the questions posted above.

FYI - Nuclear Power is much closer to 100% efficiency for energy production, compared with the figures that you quote for wind power.  I guess we should go with that then.

Picture boosted from here

Hiya Balogh et al.  In this debate I agree with George Monbiot.  As long as wind power is just a piece in a policy of endless "growth", it will do nothing to prevent the problems it is supposed to help with.  We'll still build more nuclear and coal plants, etc.  On the other hand, if we were to make NOW the drastic reductions in demand that we'll have to do eventually anyway...

In other words, to quote Albert Bartlett, we don't have an energy crisis, we have an energy scarcity leading to a cultural crisis.  Until we attack the "demand" directly, we're not dealing with the real crisis.  Yes I use electricity from the grid, but about 1/5 of the typical US household, and I do that easily and without any hardship: CFL bulbs, turn lights off when leaving a room, no constant outdoor lighting, recent model fridge, heat water on something other than electricity, no air conditioning.  If half of Americans did the same, we'd have enough electrical power for a long time...

Another issue here is the insistence of the wind power developers on using the technology that maximizes profits, without regard for anything else.  In other words, the same mindset that got us into trouble with the other energy schemes.  We can have plenty of wind power without the problems that those mega-turbines bring, by doing the following:

  • Use smaller turbines.  In the 10-100KW range.   (Of course we'll need to build more of them.)

  • Build them at lower elevations.  (This is relevant to the current debate in Vermont, where the proposals are to build them on the tops of the highest ridges.)

Yes, this will approximately double the money cost per KWH.   (The reduction in the need for large transmission lines, thanks to more distributed generators, helps minimize the difference.)  If we used the electricity sparingly, as if we appreciated the miraculous gift that it is, that price would be good enough, and it would minimize the other, non-monetary costs.

Finally, unless we stop population growth, ALL is lost.  Say goodby to the planet, even if they all drive hybrids recharged on wind power.  Food from where?  We'll have draconian birth control, or we'll have wholesale death.  Pick your choice.