Pushing for the return of the 55 mph speed limit might be a good first goal.  Even if it's only on a state by state basis.

I found this article interesting.  Hybrid owners are allowed to use the HOV lanes - and they are infuriating the other drivers.  Why?  Because they go so slow.  

There's a good reason Prius owners may be tempted to ease off the pedal. They see the impact their speed has on the gas tank. When Jim Feichtl sped along at 75 to 80 m.p.h. in his hybrid, the trip-o-meter on the dash that gauges his gas mileage up to the second told him he was getting between 35 and 39 m.p.g. When he dropped to under 65 m.p.h., he got 46 m.p.g.

When Paul Burnett of Alameda, Calif., went 55 m.p.h. in his Prius on his Interstate 880 commute, he got better than 56 m.p.g..

The proof was right on the dashboard, right in front of their eyes.

Maybe we don't need devices that automatically limit vehicle speed, or platoons of extra cops...

How about one of those instant-read MPG meters in every car?

Stimulus-response, stimulus-response...

Seriously, one of the clever parts of the hybrid system is what I like to call the "social engineering" aspect-- prominently placing instant and intermediate-term mileage guages on the dashbord makes the driver constantly aware of the mileage he/she's getting.  Driving my Civic Hybrid is like driving a video game, and I'm always doing what I can to increase my mileage at any given time.

If you want to get better gas mileage, follow a hybrid driver.

Some in a prior post suggested putting in a vacuum guage, which would do something similar.  

This is a really great idea!  We could even have an idiot light version.  A "Poor Fuel Economy" light that goes on during situations where you are getting worse mpg than normal, for whatever reason.  Maybe this could be a three LED "MPG" light, with red for poor, yellow for normal, green for good.

This is the sort of thing a behavioral economist would come up with.  With just a tiny bit more information, we can tell the motorist when they are wasting money.  Since people hate to waste money, they would have a strong incentive to keep the yellow or green light on.

I have a bike computer that performes twelve different functions and cost all of $10.  

Seriously, this kind of feedback can't be expensive, why aren't more automakers including it?  (I say 'more' because from googling around I see that a) it isn't a new idea at all and b) some non-hybrid cars already include it, I know my friends BMW does and it's six years old)

I wanna buy one for my civic, if I find an aftermarket source of any kind I'll let y'all know.

BTW, my bike computer says I get "excellent mileage" (say that with a Rain Man voice)

See ScanGauge (seems to be sold out now but coming in May). ThinkGeek.com used to sell these for $129 or so.
awesome, thanks!
I once had a 1993 Lincoln that had both current MPG and cumulative MPG. It was a real eye-opener on bad driving habits. By using the current guage, I was able to get my cumulative mileage up to 22 MPG on the beast.
My trip computer cumulative MPG on the Passat has often read over 48 MPG, and sometimes over 50 MPG.  The gauge reads a bit higher than the real economy, but it's still amazing to see such numbers from a 5-passenger car.

Haha - years ago I was riding in a friend's Lincoln Continential (one of the largest cars around before the SUV craze), and it had such a thing.  We were driving back from something one night, and he looks down and says "Look - we are getting 39 mpg".  Of course we were going downhill at the time....
Or this one for $ 27.99.

http://www.jcwhitney.com/autoparts/Product/showCustom-0/Pr-p_Product.CATENTRY_ID:2008961/c-10101/Nty -1/p-2008961/Ntx-mode+matchallpartial/N-10101/tf-Browse/s-10101/Ntk-AllTextSearchGroup?Ntt=miles

MILES-PER-GALLON GAUGE
For all cars, trucks, vans and RVs
Miles-per-gallon scale shows actual gas mileage as you drive
Easy to install on or under dash
Slash your fuel costs with this easy-to-read illuminated fuel economy-performance gauge. Color-coded zones tell you when your engine is producing the most power for the least gas. Approx. 3-1/2" diam. face. With mounting housing. Complete with Operating/Installation Manual.

This would be require only a simple change in manufacturing regulations, could be implemented quickly, and would help reduce the consumption across the spectrum of vehicle types.  My experience of driving cars fitted with these devices is that is difficult to ignore them, it is very human to try to improve your score.  Without really being aware of it, you learn a driving style which maximizes consumption.  I find myself using exactly the techniques I learnt even though I now drive a car without a meter.
Another "pain free" change could be that manufacturers are required to published detailed consumption graphs - ie consumption in various gears / speeds.  Many people are not aware of the massive increase in fuel use which occurs between 50 and 75.
This may be academic - once consumers begin to feel real pain they may demand these improvements.
My experience of driving cars fitted with these devices is that is difficult to ignore them, it is very human to try to improve your score.

Very true.  I've even seen Prius drivers comparing scores at red lights.

As long as you're at it, standard cruise control (with requirements for accuracy) would save a lot of fuel too.  And if someone could come up with an inexpensive way of making an adaptive cruise control which would let cars cruise in "trains" perhaps ten feet apart, the cut in fuel consumption from the reduced drag would help even more.
Actually, while I like a cruise control that holds a very constant speed, I believe it is more economical to let it droop on the uphill and speed up downhill.
Perhaps (for gas cars), but if it's going to be usable in traffic then you have the difficulty of specifying a speed vs. grade curve as part of the standard (so that vehicles can remain in cruise going up and down hills).  Much easier just to peg a speed and hold it.

I get much better economy in the diesel when I hold constant speed up hills, accelerate over the crest and then drop to neutral to coast down.  It would be even more different in a hybrid.  Any specification should probably be written with hybrids or EV's in mind, as everything else is going to be obsolete in a decade or so but we'll be stuck with the legacy standard.

The standard-equipment cruise control is an excellent idea.  Cruise control makes it a lot easier for an inveterate lead-foot such as myself to maintain the speed limit.  

(And like I said on another thread, here's an endorsement for the 55 mph speed limit from someone who by nature much prefers the speedlimitless conditions of the German Autobahn.  Chafing as I always have under speed limits, I really never thought that day would come!)

Apologies to Ben, who said something very similar a few posts down and a half-hour earlier.
I have a 2005 volvo suv guzzler (purchased before I learned about PO) that allows me to toggle between ave mpg, instantaneous mgp, and miles left in the tank.  I spend so much time trying to maximize my instantaneous mpg that I've probably become a driving hazard.  It has, however,  taught me to use my lead foot sparingly.
I installed a ScanGauge in my VW TDI diesel Jetta.  It plugs into the OBDII connector and shows, among many other things, instantaneous MPG and current trip MPG.  I discovered that putting the transmission in neutral when coasting down hills makes almost 5 mpg difference overall!  I am compulsive now about getting the best mileage I can because it's possible to see it in real time.  The current trip display is best for me.

The ScanGauge works on any gas or diesel OBDII compliant vehicle.  This means any car sold in the US after 1996 should work fine.  Installation is a snap - just plug it into the diagnostic socket and take a few minutes to set it up.

Check out www.scangauge.com for more information.  I notice they are sold out right now.  I paid $129 for mine and it's saved me a bundle.  I was heading up the grapevine toward LA outside of Bakersfield when I lost most of my power.  By checking the ScanGauge I saw that my MAP (Manifold Air Pressure) reading was low.  Turns out the mechanism that changes the pitch of my turbo vanes had gotten stuck.  I reached in and released it.  There's no other way I could have made that diagnosis without having Vag-Com software, a reader interface, and a laptop computer.

I also got an indication of trouble on my dashboard display that indicated the glowplugs were malfunctioning.  The ScanGauge reported an error code that turned out to be related to a malfunction in the injection pump.  Having that read out at the VW dealer would have cost $80.  Then they would have gotten me for $1800 for a rebuilt injection pump!  As it was I bought an injection pump on eBay for $377 and installed it myself.

The ScanGauge isn't without its flaws but overall I consider it a good value.

I don't imagine most people would use it to the extent that I have, but I think it's worth it just for the MPG display.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I have no financial interest in ScanGauge.

It sounds neat, but it won't work with my Civic, unless it has a proper port, and it was built in 1990 so I'm not holding my breath.

Thanks for all the info!

I had a 1990 Honda Civic hatchback.  I loved that car.  Easy to work on, great mileage and it handled pretty well.  But you're right about ScanGauge not working with it.  Too bad.
I've suggested that too - it's hard to resist trying for high score!
I've got the stickers, and I use old time good driving rules.  I stick to the right lanes unless I'm passing.  When there is a crunch in traffic I can get out in the carpool lane and pass without slowing people down.

I normally drive 65 in one of the right lanes and get 50+ mpg.  When I get in the carpool lane I might go 65-75, depending on whether anyone is catching me.

I don't think having a hybrid is an excuse for bad, impolite, driving.


There are a lot of drivers who don't care.  You could have it display the mileage in 6 inch numbers, and it wouldn't matter at all.
That's right - and it's okay.  It's not a failure just because some people continue to speed.  

Besides, I think with more awareness, there will be a tipping point of sorts, where the fast suddenly isn't cool any more.

Years ago, we owned a Jeep that averaged eight MPG.  I think it would have been nice to have instant feedback so we could try and improve.  Of course, gas was only a buck back then.  

Even an idiot light - green, yellow, red - indicating if you were sucking lots of gas would be useful feedback.  Sure, some would ignore it (the folks that aren't exactly pinching pennies to begin with, for starters) and some cars would never get a meter (like the 76 pontiac I was stuck behind yesterday) but it could still be a very useful tool and can't cost much.  Who knows, we just might learn somethin'

My Saab has this (a '93.. so did the '87... so do the new ones). Both an instantaneous bar graph and a cumulative average. It also has a green economy zone painted on the tachometer and a bright orange "Shift Up" light that comes on when RPMs increase.

I do occasionally see how well I can do, but I can't say I pay attention to it most of the time.

OK then, when you gas up, the pump will transmit the gas price you paid to the engine computer, and then it can display in $ per mile!  If anything will get attention, that will!
In Ontario, Hydro One did a study to see if power displays showing 'live' energy usage would affect consumption rates. They found an average 10% decline in the electricity used over a year study.  We just need to make electricty consumption into a game of lowest score wins.

http://www.ecobc.org/NewsToday/2005/12/TodaysNews1741/index.cfm