87 comments on Rick Dworsky: A Warm Bath of Energy -- Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
87 comments on Rick Dworsky: A Warm Bath of Energy -- Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Local
- Home Buyers Demand Short Commutes, Efficient Homes (with Backyards, Parking, lots of Square Feet)
- Streets: Utilitarian Corridors or Livable Public Space
- Summer Streets a Success!
TOD:Europe
- IEA WEO 2008 - NGLs to the Rescue?
- IEA WEO 2008 - Fossil Fuel Ultimates and CO2 Emissions Scenarios
- The IEA WEO 2008: Will coal usage be phased out?
TOD:Canada
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
- Oil Megaproject Update (July 2008)
TOD:ANZ
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
“Any coward can fight a battle when he's sure of winning, but give me the man who has pluck to fight when he's sure of losing. That's my way, sir; and there are many victories worse than a defeat.”
—George Eliot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Prof. Goose, Heading Out, Stuart Staniford, Nate Hagens
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Gail the Actuary, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Khebab, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Local: Glenn
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.





GAIA Host Collective
I love it when the techno worshippers say "probably." It usually means the new process, chemical, or machine will destroy yet another vast part of the ecosystem.
The sad thing is, they will probably do it -- right along with the coal and nuclear and burning our food crops.
Why not use our intelligence to get us out of the techno-fix business and work on devolving our tech and reducing our population?
Of course, that will not happen.
Great article, by the way, on the evolutionary basis of war and competition for natural resources at: Evolutionary Psychology, Memes and the Origin of War.
For the intelligent to avoid having offspring of their own is very feasible, of course. The problem would be getting everyone on earth to do the same. How would you set about it?
First, everybody is required to fill out the questions to determine their footprint - not so much how they live, but how they 'pledge' or 'promise' or 'contract' to live in the 'new world'. After you make your contract agreeing to how you will live, it figures out your expected foot print. From there you are entered into the 'lottery', with your odds of 'winning' the lottery equal to 1:<your footprint>. If it is determined that you will live with in a foot print that is sustainable you automatically win. If you want to live a lifestyle that is 1:30, well, only 1 in 30 will win, and the others are made into fertilizer. If you break your contract, you have the same fate.
Kevin
Sodium Hypochlorite can be made on location and quickly reacts with organic material to make sodium chloride. Since the source material is in the seawater your killing plankton in EXTREMELY small quantities. As for reducing the population will you promise not to breed? For the sake of the world I mean.
Matt (AKA Bubba)