AME Info Editorial on Peak Oil

The overall theme of this editorial is that Peak Oil would result in boom, at least in the short term, for the Middle East.   The editorial would seem to hint at the possibility of curtailing oil production, in order to maximize the life of the reserves and in order to maximize the price per barrel.  From the editorial:  "Oil prices would soar, challenging economic growth in consumer countries but protecting oil producing countries from the impact of falling revenues (as production falls)."

http://www.ameinfo.com/87093.html

AME Info fn--Middle East Finance and Economy:
Peak-oil theory and its development implications

Denying the idea that Middle East oilfields are getting old and might soon go into decline has become an article of faith in local oil circles. But re-reading the controversial main text of the peak-oil theorists should perhaps be required by regional economic planners.
Saudi Arabia: Saturday, May 27 - 2006

The most controversial book of the decade concerning the Middle East is not to do with religion or terrorism. It is Matthew Simmons book 'Twilight in the Desert: the coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy'.

However, like most controversial tomes its message has been so distorted and taken out of context that important points are overlooked. So what is the thesis that Houston-based investment banker Mr. Simmons propounds?

In a nutshell, he has examined over 200 professional papers covering more than five decades of Saudi oil production and concludes that this great natural resource will not last forever. He can not give a precise date for when oil production will peak but points to numerous examples around the world of major oilfields and a pattern of peaking production followed by decline.

Oil price hike
But in his conclusion Mr. Simmons outlines a likely scenario that would follow such a change in production output. Oil prices would soar, challenging economic growth in consumer countries but protecting oil producing countries from the impact of falling revenues.

He believes that this would provide oil producers will a last chance to diversify their economies. But oil would not run out. Indeed, the higher price would switch the focus of production to smaller fields and make secondary and tertiary extraction programs viable. Gas production would also increase.

Therefore, any notion that the peak oil theory means a financial disaster for the Middle East and an end to energy production is actually refuted in the controversial book that caused all the fuss in the first place. Clearly the main problem of peak-oil would be for the consumer nations faced with a sudden escalation of oil prices and an energy crisis of major proportions.

Data transparency
Mr. Simmons main demand is that oil producer countries publish all of the data available on their oil fields and face up to reality rather than being concerned to maintain a facade that can only make the eventual impact of the decline of oil production that much stronger. Besides, if the opponents of peak-oil are correct then greater transparency of data will support their case, and this controversial theory can be finally dismissed.

If Mr. Simmons is right and there is little additional oil and gas to be found in the Middle East and the present oil and gas fields are in a state of advanced maturity, then the implications for development are profound.

For the rapid transformation to integrated economies with strong service industries within a globalized economy is the only future economic scenario that will support a rapidly growing population base. Fortunately this is the economic policy being pursued by most Middle East countries at the moment but it could be fine tuned if more data was made available about oil production and the outlook.

Data transparency
Mr. Simmons main demand is that oil producer countries publish all of the data available on their oil fields and face up to reality rather than being concerned to maintain a facade that can only make the eventual impact of the decline of oil production that much stronger. Besides, if the opponents of peak-oil are correct then greater transparency of data will support their case, and this controversial theory can be finally dismissed.

Huh? Especially the last sentence. This is logically seriously unsound. Maybe I'm missing something. So somebody will have to explain it to me.

Controversy suggests a second side to the story. What opponent would fall for this bait? An extremely stupid one.

C'mon, hang yourself. Go on. Here's the rope.

For the record, I started re-reading my beautifully underlined, highlighted, and noted copy of 'Twilight.' I'm doing chapter 13 tonight. It is actually much scarier the second time around.

I've got some questions for Mr. Simmons. Can you forward them, Westexas?

Re:  Matt Simmons
Just e-mail me, and I can send you his e-mail address, or you can get his mailing address off their website.
About Data Transparancy:

Suppose you are an oil exporting country. It't your only serious source of income. Do you want the west to have accurate numbers about the oil that is out there?

Now what is the west going to do with these numbers?

Let's make a list:

  • Develop alternative energy sources
  • Increase tax to reduce demand
  • Sync between main oil users to avoid price bidding wars
  • Develop fuel efficient technology
  • Etc, etc.

Now why on earth would you want that?

If I was an oil exporting country I would like the west to be as indecisiveness as possible for as long as possible so I could get the maximum amount of good ol' US $ for my oil. And when it's over, it's over and we all go back home.

To summarize: There is not going to be a reliable data initiative thing.

Yes, yes, yes, but all this is the case ONLY if you are lying about your reserves. If you have plenty of oil, if you have as much oil as the EIA says you have, then you would wish this data to be made public. You would want the world to know that there is nothing to worry about.

The fact that they do not allow transparency tells me that they have something to hide.

I don't think so. Suppose now you have a lot of oil, and the price is 70 US$ because people are scared there isn't enough oil to go around. reliable numbers will only lower the price.

Why would you do that?

Why would anyone want to trade oil for dollars? It is ridiculous for any oil exporter to maintain a trade surplus where they have to accumulate promises. Dollars can be used a medium of exchange, but oil in the ground is the best savings account. We may have had the ability 30 years ago to make a major impact with alternative energy not anymore. Simmons may want data because info is his business, but I feel this data is practically useless. It's going to be a constant battle riding the depletion curve. It is unlikely we will manage to get ahead of the curve for any long period of time. The oil exporters should be more worried about their internal consumption than exporting false data. Oil exporters have to survive on the difference of thier own depletion curve and their own consumption. There is no doubt oil's relative value will increase. Saudi Arabia will more power to influence prices than ever before.
Maybe there is nothing wrong with the US$ (bit overvalued, but not by much) and maybe the people living in the M.E. also have to eat?