I usually fall back on an old idea that was taught to me about why people smoke and what made people quit.

People will almost always choose something that offers short term individual pleasure even if it risks long term individual pain. Despite our individual abilities to plan for the long term. This differs across issues, but IMHO we are still very much creatures of the moment.

Unfortunately burning fossil fuels is worse because it is a great short term pleasure and the long term pain will be collective, not focused on specific individuals that overuse it in the present.

OTOH, we can apply peer social pressure in the present to curb the immediate pleasure of wasteful individual behaviors. But that will only work in certain social groups that highly value environmentally friendly attitudes and without a mechanism to reward this type of behavior in other circles, it will largely remain a fringe group that does this.

Frankly, this is a collective leadership issue - people are going to continue to do what is in their immediate self interest until the immediate tradeoff is not worth it. Basically we need to internalize the cost of the future pain into the current variable cost (financial, social status, moral, etc) of using fossil fuels.

The dramatic reduction in smoking over the past 50 years has only be possible through:

  1. Hard scientific proof of the long term negative impact on personal and societal health
  2. Shift in public opinion that turned smoking from "cool" to "dirty"
  3. Hefty increases in the taxes on the per unit cost of cigarettes combined with new and better treatment strategies.

And yet we still have about 20% of the population regularly smoking...which is still better than 40-50% of years gone by...
I like your smoking analogy, since the ongoing description of our energy use as an 'addiction' is hard to refute, even if it's technically a little different. (Even calling it a "Chemical Addiction" is pretty near the mark.)

Anyway, as addictions go, I think that changing the habitual and monotonous use of such a substance, be it say Petroleum, Alcohol (in either form) or Tobacco is to me, akin to separating molecules that are in compound.  You can apply energy to break that molecular bond, but until you give the addict something else to replace it with, and I mean having it close at hand and readily resupplied, then the original compound is all too likely to reform.  Maybe I'm being too esoteric..

When I decided to really get out of the 'Soda' habit, over a few different tries, I saw that it wasn't about just pulling the Coke away, but putting something there in it's place, so that the empty spot wouldn't just be filled by another Coke, the way dirt was magically drawn to Pigpen in the Peanuts..

I talk about energy, to coworkers, to my family, friends, neighbors, and try different approaches in different contexts.  To the guys on my Video crew (ESPN Poker, Vegas).. I hop into the car with them as we trundle over to one Hyper AC'd hotel from our own (Very green, very green.. but my room is set at 72, and I didn't get the offered rent-a-car, but carpool with one of them each day.. Vegas busses are ok, too.), and say cheerfully, "Did I tell you that we're F'd?"  They know I'm joking, and they know I'm not, as I bring up the Oil situation again, but in a somewhat light tone.  They know that Ethanol is ~probably~ untenable, and that we're ~probably~ heading for the waterfall, and that we ~ought~ to be doing something about it.. and they want to, but I think they all "Already have a hobby"..  that's Bob's Hobby, the 'Energy' thing..

I've told neighbors about my 'intention' to get alternatives up on my roof, but I don't think that is anywhere NEAR as effective as it will be to have them see it up there.  (This Summer, after Vegas, I swear)  Actions speak louder than words, and neighbors can be acutely aware of each others' advantages and their quirks.. could take 'Talking about the Weather' to a whole new level, eh?

Anyway, I think seeing it happening in your own neighborhood, at your own office in ways that you can stop someone and ask about it will be a signifigant way of making it 'real' to people who only see it as an occasional News Item, and are just too stretched to take it to the next level themselves. It puts the other elements into the pan, so that the 'free-radicals' have something appropriate and new to bond onto, instead of going back to the prior 'solutions'..

Funny, I try not to preach at work, but the guys all know not to bring up oil, energry, the price of fuel, etc., lest they set me off!  It's not that they think I'm wrong, more that they don't want to think about it.
People will almost always choose something that offers short term individual pleasure even if it risks long term individual pain. Despite our individual abilities to plan for the long term. This differs across issues, but IMHO we are still very much creatures of the moment.

Exactly, and infortunately it is not going to change any time soon because it is somewhat "hardwired" in the brain.

See Breakdown of Will from George Ainslie.
Also of interest A Selectionist Model of the Ego: Implications of Self-Control and Emotion as a Motivated Behavior (same page).
As a quick summary, we are not rational creatures, we are not "in control" and even we try to this brings so serious drawbacks that one has to wonder which option is worse.

How do we fix the mess then?
How do we fix the mess then?

Same as fighting smoking!

Good hard scientific evidence.

Political leadership at all levels of government to promote efficiency and alternatives to oil

Social pressure against wasteful behaviors like suburban living, buying SUVs/Hummers, 6,000 sq/ft houses

Economic incentives to "do the right thing" and consume less fosssil fuels.

And of course large scale investment in alternatives!

"People will almost always choose something that offers short term individual pleasure even if it risks long term individual pain. Despite our individual abilities to plan for the long term."

One thing I have observed, though, is that when people are pessimistic or depressed they are even more short-term oriented.