yeah, I agree completely.  I have an email in to the author (Salopek) and the researcher credited on the piece, first to thank them, but then also to try to get an interview with them about the fallout from the piece and "the media and peak oil."

It was a nice feeling...a little validation usually will go a long way.

I expected some more weight towards the sleuthing behind tracing the sources of oil, and instead found a delightful human-oriented "feet on the street" look at the problem. I think that's what we need - we need Joe Sixpack out there to become aware of the problem and there were a lot of Joe Sixpacks starring in this article and film.

That's how you get people interested, show you give a damn about people like them. Put people like them on the camera and let 'em talk. Very, very good stuff.

That probably would have been me paying that gal's $1 for gas for her, except I've never been in Ill. in my life.

The piece reminded me of The End of Oil by Paul Roberts, probably because both were so well written. There is a dichotomy among the people who write about this subject. The "content" people like Simmons, Deffeyes, Campbell, etc. have the most direct subject knowledge and hence credibility, but the journalists tend to be better at telling a story that keeps the reader engaged. As authoritative as Twilight in the Desert is, I would not recommend it to the average reader because it's too dry and too technical.
Yes, Paul Roberts' The End of Oil was what got me interested in the subject. I literally picked it off the bookshelf, read the introduction and was transfixed. He explained it all quite well.
I read a PO book written by an oil geologist and liked it, complete with the decently explained technicalness. I'll have to dig it up to get the title. It included some oil geology humor. I think it was "The End of Oil" but not sure.
It also reminds me of The Prize by a certain other Pulitzer winner - who's probably taking some worried notice.