<Homework Assignment: Rates of Decline of the Largest FieldsThe Oil DrumPerception Management -- CERA and IHS Energy>
<DrumBeat: August 11, 2006DrumBeatDrumBeat: August 13, 2006>

238 comments on DrumBeat: August 12, 2006

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

DIYer on August 12, 2006 - 10:11am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
I understand your fascination with steelies, they're fun to play with. But along with the other objections listed below, I doubt you could get more efficiency out of them than falling water. You're still allowing something to fall and trying to recover energy from it. (note: filling that lake with mercury would allow you to use a magnetohydrodynamic generator with no moving parts other than the mercury stream)

But as others have mentioned, there is a tremendous amount of embedded energy in the steel itself. We use water for this application because (maybe not in the Sonoran desert, but some places) it is readily available, environmentally innocuous (give or take a breaking dam) and nature does some of the lifting for us.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
wkwillis on August 12, 2006 - 6:08pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top
NaK is cheaper than mercury, a much, much better conductor, and fluid at any place they need electricity for summer airconditioning peaking.
Go with flow cells for cheap energy storage for any place that doesn't have hydroelectricity to use instead.
0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.