This is a very important point! And it is one that is often overlooked when comparing alternative energy systems that generate electricity directly, such as photovoltaics and wind turbines, with electricity generation via fossil fuel-fired heat engines running generators.

When a wind turbine puts out the equivalent of 1 million BTUs of energy in the form of electricity, it is not displacing 1 million BTUs of fossil fuel, but more like 3 million BTUs of fossil fuel (based on an overall powerplant efficiency of something like 30 - 35%). This, of course is a very crude comparison, and doesn't take into consideration the energy input of construction, energy payback period, etc., but I think it illustrates the point.

It is also well to keep this difference in mind when considering electric cars. The energy content of a gallon of gasoline is roughly 36 kilowatt-hours. But if you have a battery-motor system with an overall efficiency of 80% , you will be able to drive that car the same distance as you would on 4 or 5 gallons of gasoline, all other things being equal (such as vehicle weigh, rolling friction, aerodynamics, etc).

Hmm, you call yourself "joule" and use BTUs and kW-hrs in a post on confusing energy units. How perfect is that?!?

Ho, Ho!

It's just a matter of convention that's all. In the US at least, the energy content of fuels is usually given in BTUs (per unit weight or volume), whereas the charge-holding capacity of a large battery is usually given in kilowatt-hours.

But if one is actually doing energy calculations, then of course it should all be in the same units, such as joules.

No, stick to your guns. If you measure heat & electricity with the same units you create the confusion we've been talking about.