<Revenge of the Shia?The Oil DrumHelp out with the technical side of TOD!>
<DrumBeat: January 17, 2007DrumBeatDrumBeat: January 19, 2007>

195 comments on DrumBeat: January 18, 2007

Comments can no longer be added to this story.

smekhovo on January 18, 2007 - 10:28am Permalink | Subthread | Comments top

Even the IEA has to admit non-OPEC supply will not come close to their projections! Then it will be a lot worse than they say - because even this acknowledgement of reality is based on admissions by governments. So much for the expertise of the IEA, and its access to exclusive sources of information!

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Freddy Hutter on January 18, 2007 - 9:36pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Your value add to this forum continues to be ZERO. The article that u quote says non-opec nations have reduced their Supply intentions to 1.4-mbd. The next paragraph says that projected Demand has been reduced to 1.39-mbd. You obviously do not grasp their term "call".

After the 2006 experience with its 1.75-mbd surplus during Q2/Q3, there is going to be great care not to over produce in 2007.

There is no inconsistency with their December status report:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2190#comment-149622

OTOH, u have persisted in confusing Fahrenheit with Celcius, Opec with non-opec, C&C with All Liquids, Supply with Production Capacity. I cannot remember a single post where "u got it".

We bear the task of watching u sit at your mom's computer throwing empty popcans from the cheaps seats...

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
pickyreader on January 19, 2007 - 12:42am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Freddy,
You might wish to look up the correct spelling of the word 'you' before you start leveling too many criticisms at other posters. You might also wish to brush up on some grammar.
Thanks

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
smekhovo on January 19, 2007 - 2:42am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

What was that again, proven liar?

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Freddy Hutter on January 19, 2007 - 8:22am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

For the loser, schmukhovo, from the lunatic fringe. This one is from NASA ... not your high school:

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
smekhovo on January 19, 2007 - 12:08pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

Lying sack of shit, do you really imagine that proves your statement that this winter (not November) was the coldest since 1994 in the Yukon?
No, of course not, because you saw the link I provided, which proved the contrary.
You're just lying again.
So piss off, you semi-literate douchebag.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Freddy Hutter on January 20, 2007 - 6:43am Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2113#comment-141885
Freddy Hutter on December 25, 2006 - 9:31pm
Bob, i'm in withdrawal for lack of skirts & bikinis up here. It was -44 a few days ago and november was the coldest since Yukon records started in 1944 (daily avg of -21).

NOAA used to have some awesome wwweb mapping of the submergent Gulf coastline, but methinx it got the axe 'cuz many were relating the rising waters to GW. The site also showed the emergent shorelines in Alaska where uplift is glacier related.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Freddy Hutter on January 20, 2007 - 6:09pm Permalink | Subthread | Parent | Comments top

While i thot i was careful to refer to the NOV record, my search of the archive today for some references on farming brought up some posts where i said "winter" as well. Mea culpa.

0
Comments can no longer be added to this story.