142 comments on DrumBeat: February 17, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
142 comments on DrumBeat: February 17, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“No civilization can survive the physical destruction of its resource base.”
—Bruce Sterling
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Yes, some 'miracle."
It's a good thing we had thousands of years the people of those times had the knowledge and skills and open space and resources to survive... good thing there were no cities with multi-millions who were dependent on technology and fossil fuels...
I think "childishly naive" applies to your statement. Try questioning your assumptions - all of them. Including the value of the "currency" you currently still have CONfidence in.
Your argument might have better if we were all completely dependent on OIL for our survival. Oil is presently the cheapest way to power our lives, but with various breakthroughs in Solar technology, and real discussion of massive wind farms off our coasts, the entire relevance of OIL is called into question.
And what is wrong with having cities with millions of people in them? Isn't that EXACTLY what the wheelbarrow advocate want? The more condensed we are, the less ecological impact we have overall. And there you go about your anti-technology rant. Technology is not some human construct designed to put an end to our species. Even Chimpanzees have been found to have been using tools since at least 4500 BC.
You may have better luck coning other ignorant and depressed people, but your confidence on this matter is hardly going to sway any reasonable human being.
Good luck with your godz of technology, science, markets and politicians. They make for good theater but they won't be able to pull a rabbit out of Ma Nature's Hat This TimezUP.
Question your assumptions hothgar. Look to history. Look to biology. Look at the current "geopoliTics" (not to mention the local poliTICs - they all wait in line for the one before them to make a decision... heads in the asses in front of them, just like a childs paper chain but this one made of foolz).
It's too late to avoid the Pain of Birth of whatever is coming next. Hopefully you survive to see the next equilibrium and your Optimism can be used to fuel our next form of civilization.
In the meantime, batten the hatches ;)
("ALL" is not lost, just the Delusion of eternal growth and a few billion excess bipedal carbon-based life forms with Big Brainz and Grand Delusions of themselves and their place in this Universe.)
Your argument might have better if we were all completely dependent on OIL for our survival.
Lets see:
6 billion + people
Various economies based on oil production/consuption
Use of oil for making stuff and providing watts for food, heat, cooking.
Please show that you are not just blowing hot air and show how 6+ billion people can continue to function without OIL.
Now you were asked to clarify in the past.
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2282#comment-160383
Is there a reason you are unwilling to actually respond to a question directly asked of you?