![]() | Gazprom is Still At It, Oh Yes They Are (or, "Gas Pressure") | The Oil Drum | It's not going to be cold enough in Siberia to... | ![]() |
173 comments on DrumBeat: March 5, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
173 comments on DrumBeat: March 5, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
- An interview with Stoneleigh - the case for deflation
- The Future of European Transport: iTREN-2030
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Men argue; nature acts.”
—Voltaire
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
WT,
Your triangle makes even more sense if you re-phrase #2: MSM that sells consumers to #1. If the consumer even thinks that suburban MacMansion or GM Suburbans might be a poor investment, advertising revenues will shrink, and our celebrity 'news' people might have to find real jobs. The extent to which they stifle debate is telling. Just look at the post below of the article from today's NYT. Peak Oilers are confined to the lunatic fringe and it is obvious that petroleum supplies are limitless.
That NYT article was placed on the front page of today's Providence (RI) Journal and featured the sub-headline "With higher prices in effect, oil producers find that old fields may be the best fields". Yeah, just gotta love those old fields, I'm sure we can count on them to meet the world's future demand growth...unbelievable.
The PROJO is owned by Belo Inc., based in Dallas, TX. Iron Triangle in action IMHO; after reading this tripe I finally convinced my wife to drop our subscription to this rag. Does anyone know if the Dallas Morning News has the NYT article up on the front page?
The thing I found most preposterous in the article was this gem: "CERA....estimated that the total base of recoverable oil was 4.8 trillion barrels. That higher estimate - which CERA says will probably grow...."
4.8 trillion and growing, that's all you need to know folks. Nothing to see here, business as usual - party on!
Loomis: I am sure you are aware of this, but it is not just the subject of oil depletion. Literally ANY subject that one takes an interest in and starts to research leads to the realization that the MSM is not stating the truth (whether intentional or accidental). Peak oil is not being treated differently by the MSM (including the NYT) than any other subject.People forget that the Times was a major cheerleader for the spooky WMD that would turn America into a smoldering cauldron.
A further note on, I think, the same track
Those who were wrong about WMD, wrong about invading Iraq, really wrong about everything, suffer no consequences, keep their sinecures, get ink and airtime. Those who are and have been right about WMD, this foolish war, NAFTA, whatever, those who are right are still consigned to outer darkness.
Being right about peak oil is not going to help anyone. Being wrong about peak oil or oil prices will never hurt CERA.
One small exception to the above; Barack Obama was at least partially right about Iraq and was very wise to be right very very quietly.
Of course the media distort the truth -- the US media serve only the profit motive (this is how we've set it up), the truth is beside the point isn't it?
Amen. Pollution, over fishing, over logging, etc. Anything that threatens large businesses will be attacked by them tooth and nail.
This was an interesting article. Without citing proof they kept raising the possible reserves. Starting with an already high estimate of 250 billion barrels in Saudi Arabia Mr. Saleri confides that the real amount is nearly three times that much and he "wouldn't be surprised" if the actual number turned out to be 1 trillion barrels. You'd think that after all these years they'd have a better handle on this.