36 comments on A Simple Oil Production Estimate for 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
36 comments on A Simple Oil Production Estimate for 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Of all races in an advanced stage of civilization, the American is the least accessible to long views… Always and everywhere in a hurry to get rich, he does not give a thought to remote consequences; he sees only present advantages… He does not remember, he does not feel, he lives in a materialist dream.”
—Moiseide Ostrogorski (1902, 302-303)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Phil,
Good work.
Given how old Ghawar is, I assume that you agree that the field is almost certainly in decline. Assuming that this is the case, every field that is or was producing one mbpd or more is now in decline.
As you know, one can define Peak Oil as the point at which smaller fields coming on line can't offset the declines from the older, larger fields. I think that we hit that point in 2005.
I expect to see continued production declines in Saudi Arabia, perhaps with some temporary bumps upward in production as some new production comes on line.
I think that David Shields is right that Cantarell will probably decline at about 500,000 bpd per year, which will have a catastrophic effect on Mexico's production.
I think that the other big risk for declining production is Russia.
And of course, IMO, oil exports will fall much faster than overall production declines.
thanks.
yes, despite the poor quality of data, i am personally convinced that production from Ghawar and Saudi production as a whole is in decline and that last year's slope was not by choice.
when i present to 'professional' audiences though, i am less bold since the evidence is not robust enough for sceptical audiences. i cannot believe we will get through another twelve months without a strong need for more Saudi oil and therefore expose far more clearly whether they have it or not.
i agree that Mexico could easily be worse than my estimate (but then i also saw a report saying their production was up in January, which will presumably be short lived?).
Russia really is the big one - it seems everything hinges on them now. They have continued expanding production longer than I expected - right up to the end of last year. Even if they decline from their December production, their average will probably match last year. But there is not yet any evidence that they are declining.. how much longer can they last?
cheers
Phil.
Khebab did a predicted production curve for Russia, based on the HL plot, using only the data through the 50% of Qt mark (1984) to generate the curve.
The post-1984 cumulative production, through 2004, was 95% of what the HL model predicted--still below the predicted cumulative production.
They are basically right around 100% now, so I expect to see a decline this year, or next year at the latest. The kicker is that, based on the HL plot, Russia is around 90% depleted (at least in mature basins), just like the Lower 48.
BTW, the Saudi decline rate, on an annual basis (not month to month), is so far quite close to the annual decline rate for Texas (around 4%).