So my question is, why would I want to survive if this is what life on earth will be like? I think I shall prefer to die with the unprepared.
Well, you will always have that option later. That may not be the case for other things, like buying solar panels now. (And FWIW...I think you'd find that life is still worth living without the kind of art, literature, food, and education you now enjoy. Most of the world lives quite happily without them. Heck, most of the world is happier than we are, though they have a lot less.)
IMO, the type of "doomer" preparations you describe are more suited for the "slow squeeze" scenario. The "Grand Depression" scenario. They won't be much help in a Mad Max or global warming catastrophe-type scenario.
And preparations may give you the ability to help the friends and family you fear losing. During the Great Depression, many people fled the cities to live with relatives who owned farms. While the farmers didn't have a lot of money, they did have food and fuel.
Of course where I live it's too cloudy for solar and not windy enough for wind, not to mention I would have to battle city council to change code (at least in the case of wind). The one option I do consider seriously is buying a farm or land. Probably not to farm it myself, but I could lease it out, or could manage land for timber without a lot of work which will probably be a good investment for the post-peak world.
Leanan, don't you live in a big city? I assume you have no garden or farm and no solar panels or wind turbines to safeguard against future collapse.
I do not live in a big city. I live just outside a very small city. It's along a rail line and a major waterway, so it might be a decent place to live in the post-carbon age.
I am a renter, so no, I don't have a garden, farm, or solar panels. I might consider acquiring them, but not now. For one thing, real estate prices have nowhere to go but down in this area.
Perhaps more importantly, I haven't decided that I want to stay here. I like the area, but I don't have deep roots here. My family is all in Hawaii. I don't particularly want to move to Hawaii. I love the place, but it's insanely expensive now, and will be completely unsustainable in the post-carbon age (never mind what will happen if sea levels rise by as much as Jim Hanson fears, or hurricanes get worse).
And yet...several generations of my family are there. If TSHTF, I may go home to be with them. Or at least move closer to the west coast, in hopes of convincing them to join me. I'm also giving serious consideration to moving to Canada.
Speaking of diverse opinions, I live in HI and think it will be a good place. The islands were pretty much self-sustaining until the US really took over in the 30's and 40's. Talk about getting back in touch with GAIA, the natives lived here for centuries with none of our modern conveniences.
Of course, if you live on the coast, all bets are off. But if you live in the low mountains, I think you have an excellent chance. The climate is very mild in the low mountains and requires no heat or cooling. A fan is nice, but you could manage without one. The growing climate, year round, is astounding. In the mountains, you get lots of rain since the water condenses as the air currents move up the mountains. It is also very remote, so it will be hard for many people to migrate here. If you grow your own food and minimize your need for electricity (or produce your own), it is very cheap to live here if you don't feel the need to be in a ritzy area. Property taxes are extremely low, and it's pretty easy to pick up a small but decent house on an acre of ag land for about $150-200K. And the prices are going down as the "for sale" signs linger...
But it does have some major negatives. Medical care is already a problem. I expect many people with medical problems will leave, and if you have any medical problems that require continuous medication, you may not get it here --let alone emergency care. As it is, even some routine tests require a trip to Honolulu.
The other negative is that same remoteness that is a plus. In the event of a natural disaster (hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc), HI will possibly be ignored by the government and will be left to totally fend for itself -- just like New Orleans. It also affects medical and other supplies as mentioned above.
One of the biggest negatives I see in the early years, assuming the crash is as bad as I think it might be, will be the "cockaroaches." When you get away from the resorts, you find that a lot of bums live here (over 10+ of the population is on govt assistance and many of them are just bums, not struggling families). Most of them just hang out and cause problems. I expect that they will be a HUGE problem and that anyone who tries to survive here should be ready to deal with theft and violence. These people have nothing to lose, and the problem is even worse than San Francisco. They are camped out everywhere in makeshift shelters and will even inhabit your house if you aren't there. Builders can't leave anything unsecured--you truly can't turn your back on your property for a moment. Lately, they've been stealing catchment tanks. If you live on catchment, it's a big problem to come home and find out you have NO water.
HI could also end up being a military target for those that hate us. But then, militarily, HI is strategic...it's one of the few outposts in the middle of the Pacific between the continents. So that could mean most of the islands would become a base. Several islands are already essentially military enclaves. That could mean that HI would continue to receive fuel and medicine AHEAD of other areas. If this happens, all bets are off on everything related to HI.
Another interesting thing is electricity where I live on the Big Island. We have an interesting mix of wind, geothermal (volcanoes), fuel oil, etc. In 2006, 23% of the Big Island's electricity came from renewable sources. I think this is one of the highest in the nation --- if not the highest. They are about to bring another wind farm on board to supply another 20.4MW of renewable energy. There is also a lot of work going on regarding the use of tides and waves to generate electricity.
Bear in mind that I'm not talking about HI as a whole, I'm talking about one island in particular. Please, do not all come here. The other reason I came here is that if I'm going to die, it might as well be in paradise. It's stunningly beautiful here in the rain forest--why die in a hellhole???
The islands were pretty much self-sustaining until the US really took over in the 30's and 40's.
Not really. Food was imported. There's a reason why Hawaii eats more Spam per capita than any other place in the world.
My family is also on the Big Island. What you see there now (especially on the Kona side) is nothing like it originally looked like. Clearing the trees for farming caused terrible erosion problems. There used to be rivers, but without the trees, the rivers dried up (though there are flooding problems now when it rains heavily).
King Kamehameha was from the Big Island. It's not a coincidence. Kamehameha conquered the other islands for Malthusian reasons: there was no longer enough fertile soil to support the population. The population back then was less than half the current population of the Big Island.
I don't live on the Kona side and consider it a total death trap. The traffic is horrible, there isn't any soil as you say, and there isn't enough water. Many folks who live in Kona hate my side of the island because of the constant rain. Fine by me.
I know a lot of retirees in my area that will leave when TSHTF. Many people only stay here because it's easy to fly back and forth, when that is no longer easy, they will leave. In fact, some are starting to leave now because the real estate bubble is popping. They didn't save enough to live here without their house as an ATM.
The history museums say that the islands were mostly self-sustaining before the US "took over," so I disagree with that. We brought the spam at that time.
Kona used to be Sticksville. I'm really astonished at how the population has grown. There was only one traffic light in town when I learned to drive.
But I don't think it's realistic to expect the residents of Kona to stay out of Hilo if things get bad.
And I don't think enough people will leave the island to bring the population down to pre-contact levels.
You might find this article of interest. It's about a study of soils on the Big Island, and what that revealed about agriculture. Very clever, really. They compared samples of open ground with samples of earth from under ancient walls, to see how exhausted the ancient fields were.
"Clearly, the Hawaiians were pushing agriculture to its limits," said Patrick V. Kirch, a professor of anthropology at the University of California-Berkeley and co-author of the Science study. "We can see that the fields on Hawai'i were getting smaller and smaller, and that there was no place for them to expand geographically."
According to Vitousek, the shortage of arable land probably played a role in the rise of aggressive chiefdoms on Maui and Hawaii in the 18th century.
"The Hawaiian Islands had a true class system led by chiefs who enjoyed elite privileges," Kirch noted. "To maintain the social order at the level they were accustomed to, the chiefs had to go into a mode of aggressive action. It's interesting that the really aggressive chiefdoms came from the highly intensified dryland systems on Maui and Hawai'i, where per capita yields were declining. They probably looked up the chain of islands toward Moloka'i and O'ahu and said, 'I'd love to get hold of those taro paddies.'"
I have heard lots of folks say they will leave if TSHTF, so it remains to be seen seen what will really happen. If tourism crashes because of peak oil, the economy here will totally crash because it is mostly tourism. That in itself might change a bunch of minds. Since we are old and retired, it's different for us. If we get 10 semi-decent years here, we'll be happy to die here. We already lost several neighbors who went back to the continent. Several went back for medical reasons, a few others took their real estate profits and moved to cheap places in Ohio/Michigan, and a few others left after deciding it was too far from family and friends. We don't have a lot of ties to the mainland, so unless forced, we won't go back.
We came here knowing it would get hard, but couldn't stand CA anymore. Speaking of CA, Kona reminds me of San Francisco all crammed into the little side of a mountain. The first time we came here, Kona was a nice little quiet town with few tourists and we loved it. Those days are long gone -- the transition has been complete. I grew up all over CA, and I can no longer imagine living out peak oil there as it has become an overall awful place. The only nice places are way too expensive, and you can't just pitch a tent. We lived in OR for 12 years and loved OR. But the winters are cold and nasty, and if fuel will be at a premium, I don't want to be retired there. We don't want to have to worry about growing food and chopping wood at our age. We were also just plain tired of the miserable winters with the ice storms and freezing spells, so we left OR. I lived in AK for 2 years and it was just stunning. But there you have long, cold, DARK winters that are really depressing for some people.
What I do know is that we planted a lot fruit trees in the past year, and many are already producing. These were the little 5-gallon trees, not the ones that were almost ready to produce. My husband started a bunch of papayas from seed, and we had papayas within 6 months. It was/is astounding. But then we live in the rain forest, not on the dry side, in a rather remote area. At this point tractors and other heavy equipment are still available, and we have taken major advantage, while we can, and hired them numerous times to help with digging holes and removing dead trees.
Community is actually forming with like-minded folks, and we have several in our group that have their "master-gardener" rating from the University of Hilo, and the group has also been working with the local government to try and prepare for peak oil. We are mostly retired and ages run from about 50 up to 72. Of course, most local politicians are still in denial about peak oil. But we love it here and plan to die here, the biggest question being when.
I think my parents are around your age. They aren't that concerned about the future, and I guess I can't really blame them.
Weirdly, it was my dad who taught me about Malthus, and told me that oil wouldn't last forever. (He's a UH agronomist, and chose the field because of concern about Malthus' Doom.) But now...he admits oil is a limited resource, and he's the one who always told me alternative energy wouldn't be enough to replace it. But now he thinks the worst that will happen is that he'll have to trade in his Explorer for a Prius.
Humans are fascinating. They probably feel somewhat like I do...that they've had a pretty good life and this is as good a place as any to bite the dust. Besides, Pele could get us long before peak oil does. She rumbles....
These people have nothing to lose and the problem is even worse than San Francisco . . .
I think we tend to compare locations in their CURRENT conditions as compared to what their FUTURE reasonably-likely conditions will be. The most useful question is not "Is place A better/worse than place B?" It's "Will place A be better/worse than place B?" once the proverbial shit has hit the fan.
Once the stockbrokers, IP attorneys, and dot-com wankers in SF lose all their paper wealth they won't have anything left to lose either. Psychologically, I think they may get more desperate than the typical Hilo-hobo since the reality of their situatinon will so greatly conflict with their personal life narrative ("I'm a financial success because I'm smart and I work hard!") and model of the world ("Progress and technology solve problems!")
Yep, likely to get ugly. I spent my last 12 years prior to HI as an engineering manager at Intel Corp. It never ceased to amaze me how many smart people did nothing but their jobs with those smarts. No matter what went wrong with their house, cars, or even their finances, they paid someone else to do it. Probably another reason I saved a lot of money -- I've always done it all myself. I just hate to have to hire someone to fix something for me. My husband is the same way, so we're actually pretty good candidates for trying to ride out peak in a remote, 3rd world type location...except for our ages. Oh well.
And trust me, it is very 3rd world like. When you can't get in to see the dentist, or it takes 2 months to get that permanent crown placed, or the grocery store is out of something common, you begin to understand the 3rd world aspects. You quickly find out that when one store is out of something, all of them are since they use the same suppliers. Cottage cheese was the last item missing from the shelves. You should see my stock of toilet paper! I guess the toilet paper scare in the early 70's left quite an impression, and it's definitely one thing I don't want to live without. The last leaf I tried gave me quite a rash.... And then there's HI time which is much like Mexican siesta time. "I'll be there tomorrow" could mean anytime next month.
We did check out Central America and were considering South American, New Zealand, and Australia too. When it came to our southern neighbors, I was concerned that TPTB might start something -- especially with Venezuela or Bolivia, and I wasn't too sure I wanted to be a pukie white skinned redhead that sticks out like a sore thumb in the darker populations. That said, we had a wonderful time and hung out with the local poor people picking tamarind seeds, fishing, and making tea. Communication was a little tough, especially in Nicaragua, because some of the dialects are really different. But the people were very sweet and gracious and loved the fact that we were willing to engage in what they were doing.
Now those populations have it tough...we are so spoiled. They live in mud/adobe houses, no glass windows, dirt floors, outdoor wood stoves for cooking, hammocks for sleeping, and no indoor plumbing, etc. Yet they are kind and sweet and don't seem unhappy, but with our different cultures it might be hard to tell. They are already living peak oil. I read that the state has cut way back on electricity to about 2 hours per day in Nic. It all goes back to what Jeffery says about the export problem and poor countries already being priced out of the energy market.
I even considered the midwest, but after growing up on the west coast I probably would have been miserable. Gary loves the ocean and undoubtedly he would have absolutely hated the midwest. NZ and Aus -- there were just too many hurdles.
You might want to think twice about Hawaii as a post-peak refuge. I just got back from the big island where I met with Jay Hanson. He thinks that island is the best place in America to ride out the collapse. Hard to argue with him: it's got a mild tropical climate so no need for heating or AC, relatively small population (147,000), adequate rainfall, and excellent food growing potential. There is food growing all over the place, mac nuts, avocados, citrus, bananas, papayas. Jay thinks a lot of the population will leave when the shit hits the fan. And best of all you have 2,000 miles of ocean between you and the starving mobs on the mainland.
Insanely expensive, yes. Land there is way out of my price range. I'm stuck here freezing my ass off in overcrowded New England. But if I had family there I'd definitely consider the big island. The other islands, forget it. Oahu is probably going to get nuked.
And best of all you have 2,000 miles of ocean between you and the starving mobs on the mainland.
I always thought that this was the primary reason that Jay chose the Big Island.
I agree with Matt about nukes, but not the scale. I think that we are more likely to see one or more tactical nukes and/or dirty bombs, rather than a full blown strategic weapon exchange.
Will there be any lesbian pirates that might like an old lady who can fix their car? Pound a nail? Solder plumbing? I'm useful, hope they don't shoot me.
Like I said, I haven't completely ruled it out. But I think it could be quite risky. That kind of isolation can be a trap. If you study the history of ancient Hawaii, starvation was a huge issue. There are accounts of battles where most of the deaths came not from fighting, but from starvation afterwards, because the land could not support both the inhabitants and the enemy warriors. And look at all the restrictive food taboos (kapu). A sign of scarcity, I strongly suspect.
Personally, I think if Jay is right about what's coming, he's made a big mistake, choosing Kona to make his stand. It's overpopulated and not sustainable. And he's moved from a place where his ethnic group was in the clear and overwhelming majority to a place where that is not the case. (Sadly, I think that will be an issue, even in Hawaii, the melting pot of the nation.)
North America has the same problems plus lots of nuclear targets.
he's moved from a place where his ethnic group was in the clear and overwhelming majority to a place where that is not the case.
In places like California the population will be majority Mexican once Mexico's oil production drops and we get the "emergency influx of immigrants" that Halliburton/KBR are prepping for.
I supposse the appropriate question is not "What are good places to make your stand?" I think the correct question is "What areas are likely to be the least horrific?"
As I was quoted in that Salon piece "the world is going to hell in a handbasket, I'm just trying to figure out which parts will be least hot."
Los Angeles, for instance, is going to be akin to the seventh level of hell. If Jay's location is akin to only the second or third level of hell than maybe it's a good choice. Ultimately the only thing I've been able to conclude for myself is this:
#1: If I DON'T want to live, move to the center of a high value military target thereby ensuring I'm dead before I know what hit me once the nuclear exchange is initiated.
#2.: If I do want to live, then move away from the nuclear targets and fallout patterns.
Of course just doing #2 does not ensure one's long term survival let alone a life worth living. But it is the first step and the only one I've been able to conclude for myself.
I supposse the appropriate question is not "What are good places to make your stand?" I think the correct question is "What areas are likely to be the least horrific?"
A lot of people, peak oilers and otherwise, seem to be moving to Costa Rica.
For me, I'm not sure I want to "make a stand" anywhere. The future being as uncertain as it is, I sort of want to keep my options open. Especially in the light of climate change. Your once-ideal homestead may end up a dust bowl, or underwater, or hit by a Katrina (or an Iniki) every year. I want to be able to leave if it turns out I've picked wrong.
I can still remember when most of my large extended family had never been further off the island than they could swim...
I tend to assumme that most folks on these boards are Testicular Cacau-zoids. Of course, you are one of the few Ovarologicals. Mind if I inquire as to your racial classification? Are you of the Hawai-zoid or Cacau-zoid persuasions? Or perhaps some new emmerging persuasion?
Those are all the reasons we chose it. But I sure wouldn't chose Kona. Too many people, not enough good soil, and not enough water. Hilo is better for all of those reasons even if it is more likely to get fallout. Besides, if it comes to that, I'm not sure I want to go on.
You'd be surprised as to how far your money will go here, especially if you are currently living in any of the coastal states of the continental US.
Well, you will always have that option later. That may not be the case for other things, like buying solar panels now. (And FWIW...I think you'd find that life is still worth living without the kind of art, literature, food, and education you now enjoy. Most of the world lives quite happily without them. Heck, most of the world is happier than we are, though they have a lot less.)
IMO, the type of "doomer" preparations you describe are more suited for the "slow squeeze" scenario. The "Grand Depression" scenario. They won't be much help in a Mad Max or global warming catastrophe-type scenario.
And preparations may give you the ability to help the friends and family you fear losing. During the Great Depression, many people fled the cities to live with relatives who owned farms. While the farmers didn't have a lot of money, they did have food and fuel.
Good points.
Of course where I live it's too cloudy for solar and not windy enough for wind, not to mention I would have to battle city council to change code (at least in the case of wind). The one option I do consider seriously is buying a farm or land. Probably not to farm it myself, but I could lease it out, or could manage land for timber without a lot of work which will probably be a good investment for the post-peak world.
Leanan, don't you live in a big city? I assume you have no garden or farm and no solar panels or wind turbines to safeguard against future collapse.
I do not live in a big city. I live just outside a very small city. It's along a rail line and a major waterway, so it might be a decent place to live in the post-carbon age.
I am a renter, so no, I don't have a garden, farm, or solar panels. I might consider acquiring them, but not now. For one thing, real estate prices have nowhere to go but down in this area.
Perhaps more importantly, I haven't decided that I want to stay here. I like the area, but I don't have deep roots here. My family is all in Hawaii. I don't particularly want to move to Hawaii. I love the place, but it's insanely expensive now, and will be completely unsustainable in the post-carbon age (never mind what will happen if sea levels rise by as much as Jim Hanson fears, or hurricanes get worse).
And yet...several generations of my family are there. If TSHTF, I may go home to be with them. Or at least move closer to the west coast, in hopes of convincing them to join me. I'm also giving serious consideration to moving to Canada.
Thanks for your perspective. About the big city thing- I think I was confusing you with the previous editor, Yankee.
Speaking of diverse opinions, I live in HI and think it will be a good place. The islands were pretty much self-sustaining until the US really took over in the 30's and 40's. Talk about getting back in touch with GAIA, the natives lived here for centuries with none of our modern conveniences.
Of course, if you live on the coast, all bets are off. But if you live in the low mountains, I think you have an excellent chance. The climate is very mild in the low mountains and requires no heat or cooling. A fan is nice, but you could manage without one. The growing climate, year round, is astounding. In the mountains, you get lots of rain since the water condenses as the air currents move up the mountains. It is also very remote, so it will be hard for many people to migrate here. If you grow your own food and minimize your need for electricity (or produce your own), it is very cheap to live here if you don't feel the need to be in a ritzy area. Property taxes are extremely low, and it's pretty easy to pick up a small but decent house on an acre of ag land for about $150-200K. And the prices are going down as the "for sale" signs linger...
But it does have some major negatives. Medical care is already a problem. I expect many people with medical problems will leave, and if you have any medical problems that require continuous medication, you may not get it here --let alone emergency care. As it is, even some routine tests require a trip to Honolulu.
The other negative is that same remoteness that is a plus. In the event of a natural disaster (hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc), HI will possibly be ignored by the government and will be left to totally fend for itself -- just like New Orleans. It also affects medical and other supplies as mentioned above.
One of the biggest negatives I see in the early years, assuming the crash is as bad as I think it might be, will be the "cockaroaches." When you get away from the resorts, you find that a lot of bums live here (over 10+ of the population is on govt assistance and many of them are just bums, not struggling families). Most of them just hang out and cause problems. I expect that they will be a HUGE problem and that anyone who tries to survive here should be ready to deal with theft and violence. These people have nothing to lose, and the problem is even worse than San Francisco. They are camped out everywhere in makeshift shelters and will even inhabit your house if you aren't there. Builders can't leave anything unsecured--you truly can't turn your back on your property for a moment. Lately, they've been stealing catchment tanks. If you live on catchment, it's a big problem to come home and find out you have NO water.
HI could also end up being a military target for those that hate us. But then, militarily, HI is strategic...it's one of the few outposts in the middle of the Pacific between the continents. So that could mean most of the islands would become a base. Several islands are already essentially military enclaves. That could mean that HI would continue to receive fuel and medicine AHEAD of other areas. If this happens, all bets are off on everything related to HI.
Another interesting thing is electricity where I live on the Big Island. We have an interesting mix of wind, geothermal (volcanoes), fuel oil, etc. In 2006, 23% of the Big Island's electricity came from renewable sources. I think this is one of the highest in the nation --- if not the highest. They are about to bring another wind farm on board to supply another 20.4MW of renewable energy. There is also a lot of work going on regarding the use of tides and waves to generate electricity.
Bear in mind that I'm not talking about HI as a whole, I'm talking about one island in particular. Please, do not all come here. The other reason I came here is that if I'm going to die, it might as well be in paradise. It's stunningly beautiful here in the rain forest--why die in a hellhole???
Not really. Food was imported. There's a reason why Hawaii eats more Spam per capita than any other place in the world.
My family is also on the Big Island. What you see there now (especially on the Kona side) is nothing like it originally looked like. Clearing the trees for farming caused terrible erosion problems. There used to be rivers, but without the trees, the rivers dried up (though there are flooding problems now when it rains heavily).
King Kamehameha was from the Big Island. It's not a coincidence. Kamehameha conquered the other islands for Malthusian reasons: there was no longer enough fertile soil to support the population. The population back then was less than half the current population of the Big Island.
I don't live on the Kona side and consider it a total death trap. The traffic is horrible, there isn't any soil as you say, and there isn't enough water. Many folks who live in Kona hate my side of the island because of the constant rain. Fine by me.
I know a lot of retirees in my area that will leave when TSHTF. Many people only stay here because it's easy to fly back and forth, when that is no longer easy, they will leave. In fact, some are starting to leave now because the real estate bubble is popping. They didn't save enough to live here without their house as an ATM.
The history museums say that the islands were mostly self-sustaining before the US "took over," so I disagree with that. We brought the spam at that time.
Kona used to be Sticksville. I'm really astonished at how the population has grown. There was only one traffic light in town when I learned to drive.
But I don't think it's realistic to expect the residents of Kona to stay out of Hilo if things get bad.
And I don't think enough people will leave the island to bring the population down to pre-contact levels.
You might find this article of interest. It's about a study of soils on the Big Island, and what that revealed about agriculture. Very clever, really. They compared samples of open ground with samples of earth from under ancient walls, to see how exhausted the ancient fields were.
That is interesting reading.
I have heard lots of folks say they will leave if TSHTF, so it remains to be seen seen what will really happen. If tourism crashes because of peak oil, the economy here will totally crash because it is mostly tourism. That in itself might change a bunch of minds. Since we are old and retired, it's different for us. If we get 10 semi-decent years here, we'll be happy to die here. We already lost several neighbors who went back to the continent. Several went back for medical reasons, a few others took their real estate profits and moved to cheap places in Ohio/Michigan, and a few others left after deciding it was too far from family and friends. We don't have a lot of ties to the mainland, so unless forced, we won't go back.
We came here knowing it would get hard, but couldn't stand CA anymore. Speaking of CA, Kona reminds me of San Francisco all crammed into the little side of a mountain. The first time we came here, Kona was a nice little quiet town with few tourists and we loved it. Those days are long gone -- the transition has been complete. I grew up all over CA, and I can no longer imagine living out peak oil there as it has become an overall awful place. The only nice places are way too expensive, and you can't just pitch a tent. We lived in OR for 12 years and loved OR. But the winters are cold and nasty, and if fuel will be at a premium, I don't want to be retired there. We don't want to have to worry about growing food and chopping wood at our age. We were also just plain tired of the miserable winters with the ice storms and freezing spells, so we left OR. I lived in AK for 2 years and it was just stunning. But there you have long, cold, DARK winters that are really depressing for some people.
What I do know is that we planted a lot fruit trees in the past year, and many are already producing. These were the little 5-gallon trees, not the ones that were almost ready to produce. My husband started a bunch of papayas from seed, and we had papayas within 6 months. It was/is astounding. But then we live in the rain forest, not on the dry side, in a rather remote area. At this point tractors and other heavy equipment are still available, and we have taken major advantage, while we can, and hired them numerous times to help with digging holes and removing dead trees.
Community is actually forming with like-minded folks, and we have several in our group that have their "master-gardener" rating from the University of Hilo, and the group has also been working with the local government to try and prepare for peak oil. We are mostly retired and ages run from about 50 up to 72. Of course, most local politicians are still in denial about peak oil. But we love it here and plan to die here, the biggest question being when.
PM me please:
matt@lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
This appears to be a a perfect breed for small scale livestock raising.
http://babydollsouthdowns.com/history.htm
I love the baby dolls! They are saving my county's ass (or they should be if people were smart):
http://tinyurl.com/3xxh9r
How did a sheep so ugly get a name of baby doll?
Look at the pictures from my post. The ones in the video did not appear to be true babydolls.
My young niece in CT is a major breeder of these things. She makes pots of money selling the lambs...
Just out of curiosity, I assume you hve discussed peak oil with your family. What do they plan on doing?
My family is mostly in denial.
Bummer.
I think my parents are around your age. They aren't that concerned about the future, and I guess I can't really blame them.
Weirdly, it was my dad who taught me about Malthus, and told me that oil wouldn't last forever. (He's a UH agronomist, and chose the field because of concern about Malthus' Doom.) But now...he admits oil is a limited resource, and he's the one who always told me alternative energy wouldn't be enough to replace it. But now he thinks the worst that will happen is that he'll have to trade in his Explorer for a Prius.
Humans are fascinating. They probably feel somewhat like I do...that they've had a pretty good life and this is as good a place as any to bite the dust. Besides, Pele could get us long before peak oil does. She rumbles....
same here.
my mother thinks it's just going to be 70's redux and over with just as fast..
Oahu is toast but the Big Island might be okay.
http://www.ki4u.com/nuclearsurvival/states/hi.htm
Most of the fallout will fall on the Hilo side, at least according to Jay.
Hi Chimp,
So, is Jay on the other side?
I think we tend to compare locations in their CURRENT conditions as compared to what their FUTURE reasonably-likely conditions will be. The most useful question is not "Is place A better/worse than place B?" It's "Will place A be better/worse than place B?" once the proverbial shit has hit the fan.
Once the stockbrokers, IP attorneys, and dot-com wankers in SF lose all their paper wealth they won't have anything left to lose either. Psychologically, I think they may get more desperate than the typical Hilo-hobo since the reality of their situatinon will so greatly conflict with their personal life narrative ("I'm a financial success because I'm smart and I work hard!") and model of the world ("Progress and technology solve problems!")
Yep, likely to get ugly. I spent my last 12 years prior to HI as an engineering manager at Intel Corp. It never ceased to amaze me how many smart people did nothing but their jobs with those smarts. No matter what went wrong with their house, cars, or even their finances, they paid someone else to do it. Probably another reason I saved a lot of money -- I've always done it all myself. I just hate to have to hire someone to fix something for me. My husband is the same way, so we're actually pretty good candidates for trying to ride out peak in a remote, 3rd world type location...except for our ages. Oh well.
And trust me, it is very 3rd world like. When you can't get in to see the dentist, or it takes 2 months to get that permanent crown placed, or the grocery store is out of something common, you begin to understand the 3rd world aspects. You quickly find out that when one store is out of something, all of them are since they use the same suppliers. Cottage cheese was the last item missing from the shelves. You should see my stock of toilet paper! I guess the toilet paper scare in the early 70's left quite an impression, and it's definitely one thing I don't want to live without. The last leaf I tried gave me quite a rash.... And then there's HI time which is much like Mexican siesta time. "I'll be there tomorrow" could mean anytime next month.
We did check out Central America and were considering South American, New Zealand, and Australia too. When it came to our southern neighbors, I was concerned that TPTB might start something -- especially with Venezuela or Bolivia, and I wasn't too sure I wanted to be a pukie white skinned redhead that sticks out like a sore thumb in the darker populations. That said, we had a wonderful time and hung out with the local poor people picking tamarind seeds, fishing, and making tea. Communication was a little tough, especially in Nicaragua, because some of the dialects are really different. But the people were very sweet and gracious and loved the fact that we were willing to engage in what they were doing.
Now those populations have it tough...we are so spoiled. They live in mud/adobe houses, no glass windows, dirt floors, outdoor wood stoves for cooking, hammocks for sleeping, and no indoor plumbing, etc. Yet they are kind and sweet and don't seem unhappy, but with our different cultures it might be hard to tell. They are already living peak oil. I read that the state has cut way back on electricity to about 2 hours per day in Nic. It all goes back to what Jeffery says about the export problem and poor countries already being priced out of the energy market.
I even considered the midwest, but after growing up on the west coast I probably would have been miserable. Gary loves the ocean and undoubtedly he would have absolutely hated the midwest. NZ and Aus -- there were just too many hurdles.
You might want to think twice about Hawaii as a post-peak refuge. I just got back from the big island where I met with Jay Hanson. He thinks that island is the best place in America to ride out the collapse. Hard to argue with him: it's got a mild tropical climate so no need for heating or AC, relatively small population (147,000), adequate rainfall, and excellent food growing potential. There is food growing all over the place, mac nuts, avocados, citrus, bananas, papayas. Jay thinks a lot of the population will leave when the shit hits the fan. And best of all you have 2,000 miles of ocean between you and the starving mobs on the mainland.
Insanely expensive, yes. Land there is way out of my price range. I'm stuck here freezing my ass off in overcrowded New England. But if I had family there I'd definitely consider the big island. The other islands, forget it. Oahu is probably going to get nuked.
I always thought that this was the primary reason that Jay chose the Big Island.
I agree with Matt about nukes, but not the scale. I think that we are more likely to see one or more tactical nukes and/or dirty bombs, rather than a full blown strategic weapon exchange.
SolarDude,
the Big Island is going to be sacked by aggressive homosexual pirates* with a taste for former mainlanders once the shit hits the fan.
Best,
Matt
*"not that there's anything wrong with that"
Will there be any lesbian pirates that might like an old lady who can fix their car? Pound a nail? Solder plumbing? I'm useful, hope they don't shoot me.
Oh, and I hope my husband won't mind....after all, it's about survival.
Oh, and I hope my husband won't mind....after all, it's about survival.
Geez, there goes that 3rd world internet connection again...ARGH!!!
Like I said, I haven't completely ruled it out. But I think it could be quite risky. That kind of isolation can be a trap. If you study the history of ancient Hawaii, starvation was a huge issue. There are accounts of battles where most of the deaths came not from fighting, but from starvation afterwards, because the land could not support both the inhabitants and the enemy warriors. And look at all the restrictive food taboos (kapu). A sign of scarcity, I strongly suspect.
Personally, I think if Jay is right about what's coming, he's made a big mistake, choosing Kona to make his stand. It's overpopulated and not sustainable. And he's moved from a place where his ethnic group was in the clear and overwhelming majority to a place where that is not the case. (Sadly, I think that will be an issue, even in Hawaii, the melting pot of the nation.)
North America has the same problems plus lots of nuclear targets.
In places like California the population will be majority Mexican once Mexico's oil production drops and we get the "emergency influx of immigrants" that Halliburton/KBR are prepping for.
I supposse the appropriate question is not "What are good places to make your stand?" I think the correct question is "What areas are likely to be the least horrific?"
As I was quoted in that Salon piece "the world is going to hell in a handbasket, I'm just trying to figure out which parts will be least hot."
Los Angeles, for instance, is going to be akin to the seventh level of hell. If Jay's location is akin to only the second or third level of hell than maybe it's a good choice. Ultimately the only thing I've been able to conclude for myself is this:
#1: If I DON'T want to live, move to the center of a high value military target thereby ensuring I'm dead before I know what hit me once the nuclear exchange is initiated.
#2.: If I do want to live, then move away from the nuclear targets and fallout patterns.
Of course just doing #2 does not ensure one's long term survival let alone a life worth living. But it is the first step and the only one I've been able to conclude for myself.
A lot of people, peak oilers and otherwise, seem to be moving to Costa Rica.
For me, I'm not sure I want to "make a stand" anywhere. The future being as uncertain as it is, I sort of want to keep my options open. Especially in the light of climate change. Your once-ideal homestead may end up a dust bowl, or underwater, or hit by a Katrina (or an Iniki) every year. I want to be able to leave if it turns out I've picked wrong.
I can still remember when most of my large extended family had never been further off the island than they could swim...
Leanan,
I tend to assumme that most folks on these boards are Testicular Cacau-zoids. Of course, you are one of the few Ovarologicals. Mind if I inquire as to your racial classification? Are you of the Hawai-zoid or Cacau-zoid persuasions? Or perhaps some new emmerging persuasion?
(He never asks me these questions.)
Okay, I will. Fess up!
Okay here goes: are you off the testicular or ovarological persuasion(s)? Or perhaps some new emmerging classification not widely known yet.
Hi Chimp,
It looks to me like you changed the questions (left one out). Anyway, just :)).
Those are all the reasons we chose it. But I sure wouldn't chose Kona. Too many people, not enough good soil, and not enough water. Hilo is better for all of those reasons even if it is more likely to get fallout. Besides, if it comes to that, I'm not sure I want to go on.
You'd be surprised as to how far your money will go here, especially if you are currently living in any of the coastal states of the continental US.