62 comments on Three Pieces of Peak Oil Media: Simmons/Kilduff and Pickens on CNBC on GAO/Peak Oil and Kunstler on Peak Oil and the Car Culture
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
62 comments on Three Pieces of Peak Oil Media: Simmons/Kilduff and Pickens on CNBC on GAO/Peak Oil and Kunstler on Peak Oil and the Car Culture
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“If kindness and comfort are, as I suspect, the results of an energy surplus, then, as the supply contracts, we could be expected to start fighting once again like cats in a sack.”
—George Monbiot
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
The "conservation" bit has always been one of my pet peeves.
It's a misstatement to refer to adapting to shortage as "conservation."
Conserving a resource is something you do when you have the choice to do so. And you're right: conservation would have been a very, very wise thing to do in the 80s. But Americans wanted Ronald Reagan, and you know the rest.
Dealing with shortage is more like deprivation.
Calling it conservation is like being a poor man claiming to be "saving" his cash.
Maybe, but if you sell your 10mpg SUV and buy a 40mpg diesel car (eg VW Jetta) your fuel bill will be cut by 3/4. You still get around just as much in the same level of comfort and safety. So where is the deprivation? Unless, that is, you count not having an SUV as deprivation.
If you wait till the shortage, then it's not conservation. Why is that so hard to understand?
We had the chance to conserve. IT's now too late to do anything but prepare to adapt.
Hi b,
Thanks and
re: "IT's now too late to do anything but prepare to adapt."
When you say "it's too late", I hear an echo of Prof. Hatfield, and in that I take it to be a sign of respect for him and his views.
My q is, do you see better and worse ways of "preparing to adapt?" If so, could you perhaps share some of those "better" ones?
I would say it depends on one's current situation. If I were a doctor making a coupla hundred thou a year, I'd be less worried than, say ... me.
I never offer advice or suggestions. There seems to be something about that that offends people, yet ironically enough if you talk about the effects of peak oil, people invariably say, "What should we do?" My answer: YOU figure it out.
"How would you answer these questions?" would be my response:
1. What would you do if gasoline were 5, 6, 7 dollars a gallon and/or only intermittently available?
2. What would you do if food costs tripled?
3. What if you or your partner lost a job? Is your job related to necessities or luxuries?
Westexas's ELP program says it all, really.
Hi b,
Thanks for your response, which makes sense. What I was wondering, though, (now that I think about it) is - what about on a larger scale? US? World? For eg., if you were the next President - or, were in some other position to put forward, say, an energy policy...or anything else for that matter...
That's kind of what I was trying to get at (without saying it as well as I could have). So, I'm interested in this aspect (of the community, national, international) as well. Including possible unilateral moves on the part of say, the US. (In the ideal case, I realize, still...)