248 comments on DrumBeat: April 17, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
248 comments on DrumBeat: April 17, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.”
—Richard Feynman
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Today there was a radio broadcast in Swedish state radio about the Iraq oilsituation. In a part of that broadcast the reporter intervjued professor Kjell Aleklett from Uppsala university and president of ASPO. He did not mention the words Peak Oil, but told, that we have a very worrisome future for the oilproduction going forward. He said, that the oilcompanys estimate a yearly declinerate of 4-6% from existing fields, and that no moore big fields is to be found, and that it is very difficult to cope with the decline with the small fields that are coming on stream/found.
Then he talked about the accelerating demand from China, and that China has a lot of money with which they certainly will buy up oil.
All in all though he did not specifically mention PO, he gave a picture of that.
The weird thing about the broadcast, that i noted, was that the reporter did not react at all to that. It was as he was talking about the weather. This gives a picture of people who listen but do not understand.
Kenneth
I have been talking to my wife for over a year now about PO. It hasn't been fun as I have gone through realization, denile, depression, and finally accepting(somewhat, for I live/work with people who have no idea and do not want to even think about it).
It has been interesting. She has been adamant to not be depressed and live life to its fullest and there is always something that people have had to endure at any point in history. She is correct of course. Most interesting is that lately she comes home and tells me of some story related to sprawl/PO. I see the gradual awakening in her awareness of just how gigantic the problem is. She is still positive which I like and envy, but realizes we have really big problems heading squarely at us.
I find most people absolutely turn you off on oil problems. They either cannot wrap thier minds around this or we have been conditioned by the way things have gone for so long. I think we have been conditioned, by advertizing, realative peace in the world, having too many choices available be it cars, food, TV programing, etc. and having so much food we are fat. This has gone on for so long that it is considered the norm just like cars and oil use. Looking at this point in history with 1,000 years time frame with PO so far gives the discussion on Po with other people.
Best D
I have been reading and occasionally posting on The Oil Drum for about a year and a half I guess, and this is virtually the only place I talk about Peak Oil. When I brought the subject up to a couple of friends, they, while admitting that oil is a finite resource and that economic growth cannot continue forever, generally blew the whole thing off, with statements on the order of “They’ll come up with something to keep things going”; essentially the “technology will save us” line. So I let the matter be, contenting myself with reading and sometimes posting on TOD and Kunstler’s site.
However, I am in a position where I have access to some of our local powers that be, and it seems a shame to waste this opportunity to at least educate them about Peak Oil, if not change any policies. I live in San Francisco and sit on several advisory boards, all of which deal with issues which will be directly affected by energy prices and shortages. I sit on the Redevelopment Project Area Committee of the South of Market, which discusses Redevelopment activities in this area, and I am also on the Western South of Market Citizens Community Task-Force, which discusses development and transportation issues in the larger South of Market area. Also, I am the Chair of the Tom Waddell Advisory Board of the Tom Waddell Health Centre (homeless and low-income serving medical clinic.) On one occasion I mentioned the Peak Oil concept to the latter, and virtually no one else on the Advisory Board had ever even heard the term “Peak Oil.” Out of my involvement on the Tom Waddell board I got elected to the Community Advisory Board to the National Health Care for the Homeless Council, and on the occasions of our twice-annual conferences I have the opportunity to meet with people in the Federal Department of Health and Human Services.
So my question is, how do I push the Peak Oil question to these people without sounding like a lunatic wearing a tin-foil covered hat? If you recall from my posts, I am of the opinion that Peak Oil was either in May of ‘05, or will happen within the next two or three years. (In other words, its NOW) I am in agreement with the poster who said that after a year or so of dramatically higher prices that all the CERA-style sweet-talk will not be able to keep the subject out of the public’s awareness. And I feel that once this happens, the investor community will absolutely panic, and the financial markets will utterly crash, ushering in a new Great Depression, which, unlike the one in the Thirties, will be unending.
So I sit around the table and listen to developers touting their projects and asking for our input. Part of me wants to tell them that if I were in their shoes I would forget about real estate development and building kazillion dollar skyscrapers and condos and run like hell as in five years we are likely to be at the beginning of an endless worldwide depression which will make the one in the Thirties look like a joke. Of course I don’t because I would immediately be considered the tin-foil hatted lunatic. Absolutely NOBODY seems to be capable of imagining any other paradigm that our 200+ year-old business as usual, i.e.: eternal economic growth.
But I hate to waste the opportunity to make those decision-makers I meet with regularly at least aware of the situation, if not the ultimate folly of most of their plans. I’m hoping that if they are aware of the situation that they just might, at some point be able to come to this conclusion on their own. So I’m posting this to ask for advice as how to proceed. If anyone wants to look further into my activities, just Google “Antoinetta III”; you should come up with about three or four pages of hits. And if anyone wants to E-Mail me privately, I am at antoinetta@mindspring.com.
Thanks in advance for any advice anyone may have to offer.
Antoinetta III
Antionetta: IMHO, you are going to lose a lot of listeners when you jump from the reality of global oil depletion to the possibility of an oil depletion caused worldwide finanical crash and depression that will make the 30s look like fun. Global growth is currently extremely strong with slightly declining oil consumption. If you tell your listeners that oil consumption equals wealth creation they are going to ask you to prove it (good luck).
Antionetta,
I have come to the conclusion that the term "Peak Oil" does not go over well with the general populace. I find I have much better luck discussing things if I talk in terms of supply shortfalls. I find discussions of demand growth vs. production growth to work well. Talk about consistent 2% growth in the US, plus surging demand in China and India.
If they are still open and receptive after that, you can talk about the lack of reserve growth, and how lots of companies are actually producing more reserves then they can produce every year.
If your audience hasn't glazed over yet, you can next mention the lack of new Giant oil fields being found. In the past we got a large percentage of our oil from these huge fields. Now we're having to try and procure the oil from smaller and smaller fields.
Lastly, if you still have any body left listening, you can talk about how the new oil that we find and produce is in increasingly difficult areas to produce. New oil fields are still being found, but they are in harsher environments, deeper locations beneath the ground, as well as ever increasing ocean depths for off shore wells.
Stress that it's not so much that there isn't more oil (there is) it's just getting harder and more expensive to produce smaller and smaller amounts.
Good luck,
Garth
Some suggestions:
1. First, realize you're never going to open a conversation about Peak Oil and proceed to lay out some arguments and convince someone right there. The best you can manage is to plant the seed and that they will follow up on discovering what it's all about on their own.
2. If they realize that oil is finite and will deplete, that's great, but you need to move them to the point of understanding that production peaks around the time the half the oil is gone, and so it's not a matter of running out, it's a matter of supply-and-demand causing prices to rise after that point is reached.
3. Ask lots of questions instead of telling them things. Ask what they think will happen. Ask until they tell you they don't know, and then stop. There's your seed. If you tell them things, then they can argue against them. If they're telling you things, then you can question them until they themselves learn where the limits of their ideas are.
4. Bring books to meetings like "Twilight in the Desert" and "The End of Oil" and "The Long Emergency". Hopefully someone will ask you what they're about.
Your #3 hits it dead on. I've given up, as it appears few want to hear about it; but that seems a good way to plant some productive seeds.
thanks.
Also, I find that people have two minds about these things; just like in sci fi. One half of our minds think that things will grow exponentially forever, the other brain thinks that things will crash and burn.
I've had a couple conversations where people went from cornucopian to apocalypic, and then back again. So I suspect that both parts are there already. People just don't want to dwell on mortality in any respect.
And mortality is ultimately what we're talking about. Mortality of the society triggers inevitable thoughts of mortality of the self, and most of us don't want to go there. At least very often, and only with certain people.
Also, I've talked about investments with certain people, and they'll go from talking about having a lot of money in surprisingly speculative investments, to refusing to have more in their savings accounts than will be covered by FDIC. I've in the past been baffled, but next time I may point out that long before any non-FDIC savings is at risk, their stocks and Merrill Lynch accounts will evaporate.
Hi Antonietta.
I've had success in getting my letters to the editor published in the major papers in Arizona -- on politics and the military, but they haven't printed my letters on peak oil. I stopped trying, thinking there wasn't much point, and that if people did figure it out they'd overrun my little town and start speculating on all land suitable for homesteading, etc.
But this thread has inspired me, and here is the letter I'm about to send around.
PS, my wife and I got together with the extended family and bought some arable land on the edge of town, have built an off grid, very modest adobe "desert hobbit house" and planted a large garden with a couple dozen fruit trees.
We're trying to walk the talk, and try to show (to others and to ourselves) that being sustainable isn't a drag, but can be very beautiful, fun, and nourishing.
Unless we make the appropriate steps ourselves and lead the way, of what use are our warnings?
Bingo. Mortality of the self is the seat of most delusion.
Really, a majority of people choose to believe that they will survive physical death. They don't think that worms eating their brains will necessarily introduce any sort of discontinuity into their existence.
That being the case, it is surprising that the human ability to rationalize lesser things away is so well-honed?
Humans tend to vacillate between hubris and fatalism. Walking that knife edge is stressful and requires constant thinking, which is annoying.
If anything, the notion of humans being subject to the same rules which govern the population of yeast or reindeer is more threatening than the idea of personal death. Lotsa luck educating the world....
really.
Good luck, Antoinetta!
That's a very attractive name, makes me feel good just rolling it around my tongue.
I find it difficult talking about Peak Oil to people. But I have noticed a pattern emerging. Those people who have a great deal invested in the "system" and have a lot to loose, are the one's who reject the idea the most forcefully. On the other hand, I've actually tried conversing about the subject with few individuals who are literally hanging on to society with their fingertips. Bums, junkies and winoes. Oddly, it's them who seem most receptive to the idea that the whole cardhouse could come crashing down. Is it because they've seen through the veil? Is it because they don't have that much to lose? Is it because they secretly want everybody to feel their pain too? Is it because they somehow know that the rest of us are all plastic palace people?
<Googling>Veeery Interesting ... </Googled>
Maybe y'all can have Woolsey come out and talk again:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2460#comment-180174
| The problem will solve itself.
| But not in a nice way.
Asking for help is the smartest thing you could do. There must be lots of TOD people in your area.
There are. Look for them in your area's "buy local" campaign, your local "slow food" group, and your local farmer's market.
It's fairly easy to make the case that many of the problems we see now are the result of unlimited growth in a finite environment. No tin foil hat there. What you propose to do about it is harder. I think your best bet is hooking up with some others - don't need many.
cfm in Gray, ME
Been trying to avoid TOD, time management, disposition thing but its tough so real quick.
Antoinetta the third,
"Peak Oil" is currently a loaded term, says you may hold odd and currently non mainstream ideas. "Oil Shortage" is likewise loaded from the 1970s. Maybe try something along the lines of, "Energy prices have been increasing rapidly in the recent past and there are many reasons to believe this trend will continue for the foreseeable future. We need to be sure to provide for this contingency in any future plans we make". Avoids the topic but gets at the crux of the problem. Instead of hearing PO people will hear about rising energy costs and be thinking, "heck yea, darn tootin' right", etc. but the measures to take are the same, except for the drastic measures. And really telling someone they are crazy to build their 1000 unit condo complex after they already have the blueprints for their villa in France just doesn't go over well. Best wishes on this.
As regards talking with people about PO, I've had some rather anomalous experiences. Mentioned PO to my sister who lives with her family on an acre with some fruit trees and chickens and well water next to a vineyard in Northern California. She said she she mentioned to her husband maybe they should move into the city to which he evidently replied, "What if they riot" 'nuff said. Told two of my older brothers to Google Peak oil. Since heard that one has bought stock in coal and the other in oil. Which says to me, yes we are aware and consider this an issue. Though it might pain me a bit to admit it, I consider them very responsible members of society so its not like you say "uproot your family and move to a tree fort in rural Vermont".
Hard to say how all this will turn out. In clinical trials and medicine there is a term called "regression to the mean". This implies that one gets a really extraordinary piece of data it is often an outlier and regresses to the mean when the test or trial is repeated. On this board I've heard a similar idea presented as "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" Also just looking at probabilities in most instances there are a large number of ways for things to turn out ordinarily and very few for them to turn out extraordinarily. Unfortunately, week by week the extraordinary case seems to my judgment to gain increasing support. Let's hope even if the extraordinary is valid we all come through without to much hardship.
Best Wishes
PDM
Hi Antoinetta - I'm across the Bay in Berkeley. We have some smart people here and one can generally convince them about the validity of PO although it's not what they'd prefer to listen to. I'm sure they put it out of their minds immediately (and try to avoid me in the future!). I think humans are basically optimistic and are genetically programmed to reject news that the world is going to hell-in-a-handbag. I’ve been advocating simple steps like putting in European-style bike lanes so we aren’t forced to use our cars. You’d think Berkeley could pull this off – but it’s uphill all the way.
I don’t think anything will be done to address PO until we’re smacked in the face with high gas prices. These will likely co-exist with a collapsing economy triggered by the bursting housing bubble. The housing tumble is just starting and will extend for 2 to 3 years as waves of adjustable no-doc mortgages reset. And for those who would like something new to worry about, check out the sites tracking unfunded municipal and state debt. I think Simmons is right – by the end of this year will see price hikes that start to convince folks that something is going on.
It all adds up to a very dismal future – hopefully just a steady decline – but who wants to think about this. Part of the problem is not knowing which direction things will go: Japanese-style deflation, hyper-inflation, or mad max-time. Do I buy puts on stocks or a bolt-hole in Idaho?
Hi D,
Had somewhat the same experience with my wife. I've been talking about PO for about two years--she listens, but doesn't say much. In general, her attitude has been that things will work out. In a friendly, humorous way she sometimes calls me Doomsday Boy.
The other day she came in the room and said, "I read the GAO report."
I was surprised. "You mean the Peak Oil one?"
"Yes. What are we going to do?"
Somehow, she needed it affirmed by the GAO in order to discuss it directly, although she had been thinking about it. Now she asks preparation questions and PO appears in some form in almost all our tactical/strategic planning discussions. She's still "positive" in that she says "Things will work out," but generally she concludes with, "Well, at least we'll have each other...."
She's a pratical, hard-working woman--nobody's fool. She thinks everything through before acting. Yet gradually it has dawned on me that "everything will work out" means for her that no matter what happens (no matter whether our plans work out or not) we are loyal and caring for each other.
"She's a pratical, hard-working woman--nobody's fool. She thinks everything through before acting. Yet gradually it has dawned on me that "everything will work out" means for her that no matter what happens (no matter whether our plans work out or not) we are loyal and caring for each other."
Sounds to me like you are a very lucky man Ric. Take care of each other!
There has been written an exellent book by a swedish doctor about how people react when they are told they have a disease that means that they are shortly going to die.
EVERYONE reacts first with denial, then with anger. It is the same with PO. You are the doctor who tells other people that their lifestile is doomed/dead.
Better not telling others, you only hurt yourself. Do your own preps and watch the events ongoing. Do not forget to by some popcorn to chew on when you are watching the drama.
I'd prefer to have my family on board, at least the ones that I could stand to live with. Any of my trusted friends as well. It will be good to have friends post peak who are as prepared as you are. It doesn't matter how awesome you are, you have to sleep sometime, and it's good to have someone keeping an eye on things while that happens. :) (Literally and metaphorically.. Simply put, one person can't do everything.)
Yes, you are right about that. But do not bother to tell other outside of your inner circle.
Matt Simmons said in a recent intervju, that within a year PO will be bigger news in media than GW. If so other people will be aware in that time frame without you having to tell them.
"Do not forget to by some popcorn to chew on when you are watching the drama."
Can't do that - all the popcorn went to the ethanol plant :-(
Delusional,
Welcome to the club. I have been irritating my wife for going onto 2 years now. With the last 6 months being a near constant feed of "why bad things are just ahead" articles and information.
She is more aware than most (and infinitely more patient) but still can't commit to wholesale life changes that I would do. But she has bought into the "reduce debt and build efficiency plan" because there is little downside if my "prophecies" never materialize. Recently she is starting to connect the dots and take my warnings about energy and disposable income more seriously. Ultimately she has helped me plan like we will live forever but live like there is no tomorrow without being a consumer.
This has all been tough on the marriage but I am confident that when things really start to unravel we will both be mentally prepared and on the same page. This will allow us to act, as a team, to deal with issues rather than going through all the stages of grief at that time. I would much rather trade some a small amount of heartache now for a strong, willing partner in the future.
Best of luck with your situation and tread carefully. The good ones are worth keeping!
I also find that the average reaction is that people turn you off. I don't think it's conditioning that causes it, though. I think when it's explained reasonably well people get the point. Their reaction then is "Either you're wrong and there's nothing to worry about, or you're right and the problem is so big there's nothing to be done." Having decided that there's no need for them to react in either case (either there's no need or it won't make a difference), they get on with their lives.
Most people don't seem ready to completely reframe their lives on the off chance that I'm not insane. 'Tis a puzzlement.
Having infected my girlfriend with the concepts of Peak Oil, global heating, collapse of complex societies, resource depletion, loss of biodiversity, species and habitat destruction and the like, she is now referred to as "Debbie Downer" by her family....
Talking about Peak Oil really does make one sound like a prophet, a prophet of doom. Doom isn't a subject most people want to talk or think about, which is understandable and reasonable.
I agree with Dan Simmons, if I've understood him correctly, that it's not so much the actually shortage of availble oil, in the short term, that is our big problem. The Big Problem isn't Peak Oil. The real trouble is how the market will react to the "news" once it goes mainstream. For lots of reasons the stock market has a tendancy to overreact to good and bad news. We are currently in a precarious situation, especially in the US where the housing bubble may be collapsing, with potentially dire consequences for the american economy. Already the US is weighed down by a mountain of debt, borrowing well over ten billion dollars a week and wasting over a trillion a year in military expenditure.
So, if Peak Oil suddenly pops onto the front pages on top of everything else, we could be heading for a very rough ride indeed.
I'm beginning to find a bit of acceptance in those near me. My wife, a most wonderful person, is very PO aware and fully supportive. (or visa versa) People at work are coming around one by one. I gave a talk this weekend and afterward the discussion went right to gardening, co-ops, and lifestyle.
I believe a big hurddle is realizing that PO may not be the end of the world it simply means TEOTWAWKI. A big difference there. Just maybe we can still live and be 'happy'.
So much of the pain that we will experience will be self inflicted. Not by conditions but the fear of what those conditions will mean. And that will make it worse.
If the oil supply is threatened how likely are we to make lifestyle changes our first priority? No we'll react in the interest of National Security, of course. The gas is $4 in Death Valley. A friend asked a trucker. "What will you do if it get's really high?" He said we'll just pass it along to the consumer. Not a hint that perhaps the cargo better be pretty damn essential if that's gonna work. "Get thee to the non-....
There is some discretionary behavior that is about to unfold both globally and locally. Americans are probably going to believe that the world depends on their dollars a whole lot more than they really do. Nobody wants our piggy bank full of IOU's. Where will the oil go? If it moves at all, it'll go where both the money and the political influence are.
In Africa for instance the Chinese are making deals while we plan military bases. Our gameplan looks flawed.
My point. We better be ready to make the mother of all transitions in the way we run our lives. Also, unless we can get the word out to enough people of what to expect, they are going to find some above ground cause to blame. As with the TPTB program you don't want to be that above ground cause.
That's why the sit back and enjoy the show idea worries me. I'm pretty sure this show can jump right through the camera lense and into our living room. Kunstler is right to go after the media. Better to keep trying to get the word out. I still believe forewarned people will make better choices.
This is why I think the ExxonMobil/CERA position (trillions & trillions of barrels of oil) is so damaging.
In effect, they are encouraging people to proceed with the SUV/Suburban way of life.
There are going to be some plenty pissed off FWO (Formerly Well Off) Americans as their SUV's are repossessed and as their McMansions are sold in foreclosure auctions.
The semi-logical conclusion that a lot of Americans will draw--based on the ExxonMobil/CERA pronouncements--is that oil is being deliberately withheld off the market in order to drive the price up.
From the Housing Bubble:
"This is why I think the ExxonMobil/CERA position (trillions & trillions of barrels of oil) is so damaging."
Kind of a set up for 'above ground factors'
"In effect, they are encouraging people to proceed with the SUV/Suburban way of life."
Pissed off FWO's. WT, that's another one!
This is what I mean -
‘For this rise in foreclosures to be happening in the midst of a strong labor market is truly unique and scary’
Apart from repeating an article of faith concerning how Americans view their economy, what facts support this idea of a strong labor market? There are a number of facts showing it is anything but strong - like foreclosure rates, for example.
Reality is happening, unavoidably, but as it doesn't fit into the framework which reality is supposed to, most Americans keep repeating the same items of faith.
Chanting may help the soul, but it won't bring rain, or fill the pipeline with oil.
This is in part what I meant - the pain is self-inflicted, as reality doesn't care about any person's dreams.
And the reality is, all societies have collapsed in the end, but watching a society teeter off the edge because it now can't imagine changing itself in any significant way (and turned its back on changing itself when I was younger) has been fascinating in a morbid way.
The changes are coming anyways, but there is a major difference between trying to prepare and having those preparations fall short, and doing nothing and just being overwhelmed by 'random events.'