I think so. The Dow Jones version of this story said:

With the arbitrage window for crude oil from the West closed and Saudi Arabia maintaining term supply cuts for June, some refiners in Asia may take spot cargoes for July loading, helping to push up spot premiums further.

Thanks. That makes sense.

But the Saudi's have been cutting supplies to Asian refineries since November last year. I am wondering how they have coped with reduced supplies so far. There are no reports of fuel shortages from countries affected by the cutbacks.

Prices have gone up in Asia and Europe.

And some have said that the Asian refiners can't handle heavy crude. There was that story about China rejecting some shipments because their refineries couldn't handle that much heavy sour. So maybe the cuts were not that big a deal.

The interesting thing is, for the first time, Saudi Arabia is cutting back the light stuff, too.

The interesting thing is, for the first time, Saudi Arabia is cutting back the light stuff, too.

Yup! That is the key!!
So far the cuts were for heavy or medium grade crude. Now they are beginning to cut the supply of light grade crude. The next few months should be interesting.

There are no reports of fuel shortages from countries affected by the cutbacks.

News.google- Asian Fuel Shortage -and get a different opinion. Or better still just news.google Fuel Shortage because it is a worldwide problem.

Fuel is being diverted from Africa, (those unable to pay higher prices) to Asia, (those able to pay higher prices).

Hey, think about it. You say they are buying more oil from the spot market. The Asian spot market is simply tankers willing to sell to the highest bidder. If some Asian country outbids Zimbabwe or wherever for oil, and averts a shortage in that part of Asia, that just means the shortage is shifted to someone else who could not afford to bid high enough.

Ron Patterson

The African countries, are they bidding on spot crude or do they bid on refined product? Do they have their own refineries, or do they bid on crude that is later refined in a third country?

I just watched the very excellent documentary, Manufactured Landscapes. In it there is a section on the ship salvaging area of Bangladesh. There is a shot of 100 men carrying by hand a giant, 2 and a half inch cable along the tidal flats. In the bonus features, the filmakers say they asked the foreman why they didn't use their winch to pull along the cable. The foreman did some quick math, saying hiring 100 men at 10 cents an hour cost them $10. The diesel for the winch would cost them $15. Is this our future?

Here is a website by a well known photographer and teacher, who visited that part of Bangladesh (he is also a videographer and perhaps the video you saw was partly his doing). He has a pic of a cable gang:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/locations/ship-breaking.shtml

His conclusion:

I am not a social activist. I went to the yards with my workshop's members to simply photograph what I knew to be one of the world's most fascinating locations for unique images. But, I was deeply affected by the working conditions at Chittagong, as I was with the fact that this incredibly poor country still has child labour, and numerous other social ills, at least by the standards of advanced western countries.

There are organizations that are working with the people and government of Bangladesh to address these ills, and though it isn't the intent of this photo essay to grind any axes, maybe in its own small way it will draw the world's attention to this distressing situation.

Is this our future?

Yes. But first and foremost in agriculture.

Also Jeffery Brown's estimation of our future. I bet OPEC is reading TOD and thinks Jeffery has the "nut flush". Cut back on contracted volumes and allow selling on spot market to the highest bidder. Makes perfect sense.
Jeffery, I have to give you a hand on this one, that was a very insightful call on your part. Your other comments are with out a doubt coming to "fruition" as well, as much as I don't like reading any of it.
Farmland or light rail accessable? I bet you will say farmland...
Best, D

What about Nepal?

I can't help but think there's a lot of countries that will be going the way of Nepal. They can't pay their fuel bill, so they've been cut off. They are begging for delivery to be resumed, but they can't pay. And I don't see how they will ever be able to pay. They've fallen so far behind. I guess they're hoping that oil will get cheaper, or their economy will boom, giving them more money to spend.

I also recall a story from 2004, when oil prices first started to spike. The forests were being denuded, as people turned to firewood instead of fossil fuels for cooking.

Nepal sells hydroelectricity to India, which desperately needs every MWh it can get (with more projects in the pipeline). So there is hope for them long term. Nepa; is probably a net energy exporter and can expand that.

Not true for other nations.

Alan

Nepal has a huge population problem... several times larger than the 1900 level, to which it must eventually find a way back. The current growth rate is 2.17 (CIA Factbook 2006, via Wikipedia). Ominous signs.

ciao,
Bruce