The answers for your question is in the articles. Were you unable to read them.
They already said the waste (unburned) fuel will be stored on site. Just like all other fuel for Canadian reactors currently operating are stored on site.
I have already answered your questions. You complain that I don't have the answers while in fact I did answer your questions. Which you could not take the time to contribute by simply reading what I had already provided or googled.
So I find your whining worthless when you do not read or try to understand.
I found all of the details and answers that you were unable to do for yourself.
So your welcome. I know you want to thank me but you are embarassed by your inability to read wikipedia or google. I guess you have some kind of internet dyslexia. Should we start an internet fund raiser for you. You say that numbers are crunched here. Why don't you prove it. I have not seen your crunched numbers. Dazzle me with your number crunching savant skills. I say savant skills since you are unable to communicate without insult tourettes or actually completely reading a set of articles or information.
In a few years we will see who is right about the world. I bet this project happens and your statement about $15/gallon does not. So this is a little preview of the future. I also bet that by 2025 the second oilsand reactor is also operating.
Well, this is useless Brian. You can't answer my questions, nor defend your points, because you have done no research.
Pointing back to the same industry promo clips that your entire 'post' is based on, is void of any meaning. It does, however, make abundantly clear what the level of your thinking and writing is.
And that is, as I said, way below par for TOD. I'm starting to think you were set up, and you'll be the laughing stock of the family soon.
In the meantime, are you going to tell us if you work for the nuke industry? Personally, I can't figure any other reson why someone would produce this drivel.
PS I didn't make this personal, you did, And you're not very good at that either.
PS 2 You say:"You say that numbers are crunched here. Why don't you prove it."
I'm sure Stuart et al will really appreciate being cut to size in this manner.
Any idea how much energy is lost when instead of direct use of natural gas or nuclear they are used to refine this third product oil?
Seems like we are trading one lame horse for another lame horse, and that to run a senseless horse; the auto industry.
As far as multiples of nuclear plants, where is all that water to come from, I am led to understand that present use is about maximum? Could be wrong here though and as well maybe it would be a goodly step in removing our treaty obligations with the first nations, you know that part that goes....'So long as the sun shines the grass grows and the rivers run'. Get those nukes steaming away and with Monsanto having a lock on the death of grass and just about everything else green and growing all we would have to do then is wait for a solar eclipse and voila this devastated land would really be ours...the only question is would we want it?
You obvisouly do not comprehend the scope of what is happening with the resurgence of the nuclear industry. 30 reactors being built right now. $60+ billion going into to that.
In Canada, they already have all the local, provincial and federal support. Candu cut big money deals with Hitachi to ensure no taxpayer financed overruns. They do not need anyone readig the Oil drum to agree with them.
I am saying prove anything that you "HeisSofly" are saying. None of what you said has any number crunching. None of what you say has any research. I am saying that you cannot figure your way out of a paper bag. It is why you think because information that upsets your world view is presented you think that someone must be paying me to present it.
you say that you did not start making it personal. Reread your first posts. You are a silly liar and a buffoon.
GAIA Host Collective
The answers for your question is in the articles. Were you unable to read them.
They already said the waste (unburned) fuel will be stored on site. Just like all other fuel for Canadian reactors currently operating are stored on site.
I have already answered your questions. You complain that I don't have the answers while in fact I did answer your questions. Which you could not take the time to contribute by simply reading what I had already provided or googled.
So I find your whining worthless when you do not read or try to understand.
I found all of the details and answers that you were unable to do for yourself.
So your welcome. I know you want to thank me but you are embarassed by your inability to read wikipedia or google. I guess you have some kind of internet dyslexia. Should we start an internet fund raiser for you. You say that numbers are crunched here. Why don't you prove it. I have not seen your crunched numbers. Dazzle me with your number crunching savant skills. I say savant skills since you are unable to communicate without insult tourettes or actually completely reading a set of articles or information.
In a few years we will see who is right about the world. I bet this project happens and your statement about $15/gallon does not. So this is a little preview of the future. I also bet that by 2025 the second oilsand reactor is also operating.
Well, this is useless Brian. You can't answer my questions, nor defend your points, because you have done no research.
Pointing back to the same industry promo clips that your entire 'post' is based on, is void of any meaning. It does, however, make abundantly clear what the level of your thinking and writing is.
And that is, as I said, way below par for TOD. I'm starting to think you were set up, and you'll be the laughing stock of the family soon.
In the meantime, are you going to tell us if you work for the nuke industry? Personally, I can't figure any other reson why someone would produce this drivel.
PS I didn't make this personal, you did, And you're not very good at that either.
PS 2 You say:"You say that numbers are crunched here. Why don't you prove it."
I'm sure Stuart et al will really appreciate being cut to size in this manner.
HeIsSoFly,
Any idea how much energy is lost when instead of direct use of natural gas or nuclear they are used to refine this third product oil?
Seems like we are trading one lame horse for another lame horse, and that to run a senseless horse; the auto industry.
As far as multiples of nuclear plants, where is all that water to come from, I am led to understand that present use is about maximum? Could be wrong here though and as well maybe it would be a goodly step in removing our treaty obligations with the first nations, you know that part that goes....'So long as the sun shines the grass grows and the rivers run'. Get those nukes steaming away and with Monsanto having a lock on the death of grass and just about everything else green and growing all we would have to do then is wait for a solar eclipse and voila this devastated land would really be ours...the only question is would we want it?
You obvisouly do not comprehend the scope of what is happening with the resurgence of the nuclear industry. 30 reactors being built right now. $60+ billion going into to that.
In Canada, they already have all the local, provincial and federal support. Candu cut big money deals with Hitachi to ensure no taxpayer financed overruns. They do not need anyone readig the Oil drum to agree with them.
I am saying prove anything that you "HeisSofly" are saying. None of what you said has any number crunching. None of what you say has any research. I am saying that you cannot figure your way out of a paper bag. It is why you think because information that upsets your world view is presented you think that someone must be paying me to present it.
you say that you did not start making it personal. Reread your first posts. You are a silly liar and a buffoon.
===============
http://advancednano.blogspot.com