![]() | Oil Company Profits and High Gas Prices: Here We Go Again | The Oil Drum | API Conference Call on Gas Prices | ![]() |
311 comments on DrumBeat: May 23, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
311 comments on DrumBeat: May 23, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“So one may almost say that the theory of universal suffrage assumes that the Average Citizen is an active, instructed, intelligent ruler of his country. The facts contradict this assumption.”
—James Bryce (1909, 35)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
I was having a quick look at the ExxonMobil 2006 annual report today: http://www.exxonmobil.com
While the bottom line is 135% reserves replacement ratio, 75% of their reserves additions were through purchases! (746 out of 990 million barrels, before year end price effects). Somebody else lost a lot or got completely swallowed to give Exxon such a rosy shine :-)
Year end price effects added another 325 million barrels, so total additions were 1315 against production of 976. Don't know why year end revisions were so high, especially because the oil price at the end of 2006 was about the same as end of 2005.
cheers
Phil
www.philhart.com
So, according to your numbers, their production was 733Mb and they found new reserves of 244Mb, so they only replaced 1/3 of their reserves... actually, it is even worse than this WRT liquids...
THey are booking new gas reserves in Qatar and calling them 'boe'; production from old fields are mostly liquid while new reserves are mostly lesser value stranded gas... and, worse still, their investements and 'reserves' in Venezuela are disappearing. IMO, gassier xom will find oily oxy irrisistable at, say, a modest $60B.
XOM does not just know the future, they are in it.
And yet they continue to push demand up as much as possible with their denials of peak oil and their denials of global warming.
Good guess about Occidental, if XOM doesn't want them, Chevron or Connoco-Phillips will. The annual report also boasted about 11,000 acres in the Newark Barnett Shale (Fort Worth), and their land acquisitions in the Piance Basin. That's all economicially marginal gas, but its their first significant onshore US plays in 30 years. They also have a big woodford-barnett play in the Marfa basin, not in their report. I'm thinking that the political heat is making them pursue US gas exploration.
One notable absence is the Athabasca tar sands, which means they don't consider it an economic play.
These figures are oil (liquids) only. Exxon does at least report oil and gas reserves separately, unlike most of the other major oil companies, who are indeed using BOE to hide their own oil reserves failures.