Canada strikes back!!

"Canada and the energy sector may want to dust off those plans for an oil pipeline from Alberta to the B.C. Coast aimed at opening new markets in Asia for Canada's oil."

Oilsands gain a dirty name

Forget Canada's image as a source of secure energy to the United States.

That was a couple of years ago, when the flavours of the day south of the border were indignation over soaring gasoline prices, while dependence on Middle East oil was the root of all evil, including the war in Iraq.

Now that Hollywood actors are buying carbon offsets to feel even better about their air-conditioned mansions and private jets, Canada is held in contempt for being the source of the dirtiest oil on the planet -- the oilsands.

It's an image that is ramping up quickly, pumped by politicians such as Al Gore, who has criticized oilsands developers for tearing up four tonnes of landscape for every barrel of oil produced, and by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a champion of low-carbon fuel standards aimed at cutting imports from places like Alberta.

All in all, it's an offensive image that Canadians must nip in the bud, before Americans get too cozy blaming us for their environmental failures, while ignoring other inconvenient truths.
-----------------
The image of Canada a source of dirty energy shouldn't come as a surprise, given U.S. propensity to take Canada's energy for granted.

Meanwhile, Canada and the energy sector may want to dust off those plans for an oil pipeline from Alberta to the B.C. Coast aimed at opening new markets in Asia for Canada's oil. Those plans were postponed last year in favour of building more oil pipelines to the United States. Now, Asian markets are suddenly looking more secure.

The americans might complain about our dirty energy, but does anyone seriously think they won't keep using it as fast as they can? "Energy independence" is not going to happen in the US in the forseeable future. Even a massive collapse of the economy (that dollar of their's sure is sinking fast...) won't do it...last I read, they were at about 75% energy imports.

It's a given that Americans will blame us for their own environmental failures, just as they blame everyone else in the world for, well, whatever problem shows up. Canada gets to sit next to them and blame the US though, which while having the advantage of being slightly more true in most cases (on a total level, not a per capita level), certainly isn't going to help things here any. Blame games are beyond pointless. You don't launch investigations while still on the sinking ship.

I think the best hope for awakening Canadians to problems is the environmental angle. Most already recognize the major problems there (although personal action hasn't kicked in large scale yet), and since some solutions overlap so well with peak oil mitigation strategies (solar/wind energy, carbon taxes, house isulation, etc...), if one is dealt with, the other at least has a great start.

This is where I see regionalism helping out, although I too fear for Canadian unity. Provincial governments have started to give up on the federal gov't ever doing anything, and are just starting to implement things on their own. Harper can go force himself further into Bush's ass if he wants to. Since long-term planning must necessarily be on a local level anyway, forcing provinces and cities to deal with these things themselves, while unfair given the tax collection distribution, is fine by me if it results in actions being taken. That's going to start picking up steam soon, right?