![]() | Will OPEC increase supply in the 2nd half of 2007? Or has Ghawar peaked? | The Oil Drum | Can We Be Happy Using Less Energy? Uhhh.... YES! | ![]() |
18 comments on Science and Technology Energy and Environment Subcommittee Action Today
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
18 comments on Science and Technology Energy and Environment Subcommittee Action Today
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Men argue; nature acts.”
—Voltaire
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Looks like CAFE will see some sort of rise.
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070621/BUSINESS01/7062...
If the truck numbers stay as they are the pick up truck will be going the way of the dodo.
Automakers already are having fits trying to implement Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards for 2010.
They all add weight.
Spaceman,
My son's Toyota Tacoma pick-up gets 30 MPG highway at 62 MPH and 27 city with a 6 cylinder engine. These are his actual calculations. So, the new standards are acheivable.
George W. Bush wants 35 MPG by 2017, this bill wants it by 2020. The quicker the better!
Thats great. I had a S-10 with a 5 speed manual and a 4 cyl and the best I got was 25mpg. Must've been that optional rear bumper;-)
Still by 2010 the game changes with lots of added side impact protection.
So you have the gubbermint saying on one hand "protect at all costs or no 5* rating" and on the other "35mpg by 2020"
Its all about weight and what you'll end up with won't be recognizable as a truck.
Don't get me wrong, nothing pisses me off more than to see a Dodge Ram 10cyl(w/racing stripes!) on my bumper in the fast lane. But for those who actually need them farmers, ranchers, etc. tough luck. Auto production is platform based and "trucks" of the future will have to become carlike (think low ground clearance and low towing capability) to make those numbers.
People who really need pickup trucks might be happy to have them painted in dirt colours with no speed stripes. I'd also like to see mud streaks (from creek crossings) on SUVs with snorkel air intakes.
Yeah, seeing a snorkel is pretty rare.
I just want to clear up something. There is a strong belief at work that the immense popularity of trucks in the 1990's stemmed from people wanting body on frame, rear wheel drive vehicles. Almost all cars at the time were front wheel drive unibody or body-frame integral. And car sales sucked. (4wheel drive was just about status, mostly).
Frames add weight and height to vehicles but make them strong.
In order to make those numbers they're talking, the frames gotta go and the vehicle must get closer to the ground for better aerodynamics. No more truck.
So when Detroit rolls out their El Camino looking pick ups its gonna be a shock. Especially when they find can't haul anything.
Good night.
Here in the SW USA, that would encourage more drivers to ford the flashflood. Hmmm... it would give Darwin a better chance to work. Yeah, I think snorkels could be EROEI positive (by getting idiots off the road) heh, heh.
A large pickup won't have to make those numbers. They just have to sell enough 50mpg cars to to get the average up to 35 mpg. There are plenty of 50mpg cars in Europe. We will probably have to make safety more the responsibility of the driver, and go bact to th 55 mph speed limit.
Actually pickups and suv's fit under the "light truck" category with a seperate CAFE category, I believe this legislation does away with that distinction. Which is also why all the major auto co.s have their truck programs on hold, to see what is the outcome of this legislation.