![]() | Will OPEC increase supply in the 2nd half of 2007? Or has Ghawar peaked? | The Oil Drum | Can We Be Happy Using Less Energy? Uhhh.... YES! | ![]() |
18 comments on Science and Technology Energy and Environment Subcommittee Action Today
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
18 comments on Science and Technology Energy and Environment Subcommittee Action Today
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Where ideas are concerned, America can be counted on to do one of two things: take a good idea and run it completely into the ground, or take a bad idea and run it completely into the ground.”
—George Carlin
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Update on the Energy bill:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070622/ap_on_go_co/congress_energy
As it turns out, the new standard on auto fuel economy will be 35 mile per gallon, not 52, as was orignally proposed and quoted in the above post and extraction....quite a difference. And all this by the year 2020.
Opinion: Technology will have so antiquated these standards by 2020, they will be as useless as the infamous red flag act at the birth of the auto age.
If the CAFE standars are idiotic by being so low over such a long time span as to be completely meaningless, the ethanol plan suffers from being so grandious as to be farcical, akin to Swift's castles in the air:
"The legislation would require ethanol production for motor fuels to grow to at least 36 billion gallons a year by 2022, a sevenfold increase over the amount of ethanol processed last year."
That comes out to around 2.4 million barrels per day (check my math) or roughly 10% of current U.S. gasoline consumption, i.e., roughly the level "gasahol" would consume. So forget big volumes of E85, even the guv'ment don't see it happening. But the consumption increase in natural gas and corn will be staggering just to pull that little bit off. If you thought solar to hydrogen was not "scalable" wait until you see this mess. Solar to produce distributed hydrogen will look as easy as a high school science project by comparison.
So, what's the one bet we can safely make based on current reading of this energy bill? Buy corn.
Roger Conner Jr.
Remember, we are only one cubic mile from freedom
(and we ain't gettin' there on alcohol :-)
No kidding. By 2020 I expect my flying car powered by a Mr Fusion!