I've watched a little of the LiveEarth concert on TV too.

Has anyone else noticed that all the adverts that ask you to "answer the call" mention how much ENERGY can be saved by doing the recommended activity (recycling, reusing, inflating tyres, CFL bulbs, etc.) - no mention of GW, even though GW awareness and action is the stated reason for the concert.

Could GW really be the non-panic method of getting populations to power down?

"You can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created."
Albert Einstein

Could GW really be the non-panic method of getting populations to power down?

If one thinks that addressing overpopulation, mis-management of energy, arguments over taxes/fiat money/blowback over the way oil has been handled in a political manner - and the endpoints on these would be 'lower energy use' which is gonna be the less messy sell: Fix any/all of the various energy related problems *OR* blame everyones use of fossil fuels and powerdown because of GW?

GW might be the 'not as panic-y' way to power down. Other alternatives like the oil nations not accepting American Dollars strikes me as the more messy options. :-(

IMHO, by addressing energy use, but hiding that behind only one facet of the issue (i.e. GW/carbon emissions), we fail to acknowledge other facets of the problem.

By concentrating on GW, awareness of economic ideals of infinite growth/debt/banking/etc., population overshoot, externalities encouraged by industrialised nations (such as child labour/environmental degredation) and so on are not being considered properly, if at all.

"You can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created."
Albert Einstein

"You can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created." Albert Einstein

Here's another Einstein quote that also fits the discussion:

"The formulation of the problem is often more essential than its solution” - Albert Einstein