8 comments on Congestion Pricing: It all comes down to three men in a room
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
User login
Personnel
Classic posts
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
PONYC Archives
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
GAIA Host Collective
It seems clear to me that something has to be done about energy usage for transportation. More than half of what we import goes to personal transportation. We can talk hybrids and ethanol all we want, but a major lifestyle change will be needed if we hit the wall on oil about 2012. I do not want to go to war for oil ever again.
CalG
Your figure of half for transportation may apply on average, but much more energy goes to heat, cool and otherwise power the buildings in NYC (as established by PlanNYC). It might be easier to address the energy consumption of transportation in NYC, but it will not address the lion's share of the problem.
NYC is not a country. Even though this article is about NYC, this fee would not even begin to solve the energy usage problem. Since this is an oil site and not a traffic congestion site, I think it is appropriate to address the larger issue. California uses more than 6 or the 20 million barrels of oil per day used by the U.S. Los Angeles could work on getting people to live closer to where they work. Commuting in California uses a LOT of gasoline and pollutes the air.