179 comments on Net Oil Exports and the "Iron Triangle"
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
179 comments on Net Oil Exports and the "Iron Triangle"
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Bob,
In regard to your first question, in post-peak exporting countries, I think that we will see Phase One and Phase Two.
In Phase One, their cash flow from export sales will increase, even as their net exports decline--because of higher oil prices.
In Phase Two, their cash flow from export sales will decline, as their net exports continue to decline--because rising oil prices are not sufficient to offset declining net exports.
It will be extremely difficult--if not all but impossible--for exporting countries to curtail domestic consumption in Phase One.
And even in Phase Two, I expect to see massive resistance against efforts to curtail domestic consumption, probably leading to varying amounts of violence.
Also understand that as time goes forward the demands for investment in the oil industry to maintain production only increase. Look at Mexico and Venezuela and now Russia as example where needed investment is not forthcoming. As a country moves from phase 1 to phase 2 pressure to lower investment in the oil industry to continue to support internal projects only increases. Here Venezuela is the poster child.
So its reasonable to expect that as time goes on these countries will not reinvest in their oil infrastructure at anything like the rate investments where made in the western nations at the same time that the amount of needed investment is doubling or tripling in price because of the intrinsic nature of oil in our economy.
We have already seen the costs for investments in oil infrastructure spiral out of control as high oil prices and demand cause more general inflation.
I'd like to see some projections on when a country moves from phase one to phase two.
Finally I think the market will remain fairly clueless about ELM for some time and thus we can expect oil to remain under priced vs the real price needed to prevent exporting countries from going from phase one to phase two with the potential for major cutbacks in investment.
So in my opinion the market by underpricing oil will force most oil producing countries into a phase two situation far sooner than most people realize. I actually think we are already in phase two since we have every indication that all the major oil producing nations are pulling back rapidly on re-investment in the oil industry. At that point ELM becomes a optimistic model probably highly optimistic as producers continue to cut so they can get back into phase one growth.
We have every indication that we have already entered this war between and unrealistic under priced market and producers steadily cutting to get the large profits they need for internal use at phase one growth rates. At this point only a rapid repricing of oil above that needed to get back too phase one along with continued strong demand at the higher price point will spur a reversal of this game of chicken.
See Iran for early Phase 2.
Indonesia, deep into Phase 2 (and importer of oil by quantity, but still a SMALL exporter by value due to high quality oil produced) endured blackouts rather than buy heavy bunker oil while waiting for new coal fired power plants to be completed.
A worthwhile point of discussion is when will the Phase 1 to Phase 2 transition take place.
My guesses:
Mexico within 2 or 3 years.
Venezuela just after the next Presidential election in about 5 years.
Russia within eight years, but more than three years.
Oddly, Norway, with the HIGHEST gas taxes in the world, could be said to be in Phase 2 and never in Phase 1.
I expect 70% or so of Norway's remaining URR to be exported, the highest in the world.
Best Hopes for doing SOMETHING now,
Alan
Norway is rather a special case. Due to their low (c 5m) population the percentage of total prod'n available for export remains high well into their decline phase. Their population is relatively stable and living standard already among the world's highest. It's also one of the last places you'd expect to see unrest, quite unlike many ME states.
Phase One could last a very long time. My guess is that we are likely to see price spikes to high levels that will be sustained ($100-200) and this will generate tremendous income and raise living standards significantly in exporting countries everywhere but Norway. The difference between $40 oil and $150 oil offsets a lot of years of 5% production declines as far as net income goes.
Prius / Suburban = 4.6
Ken
Westaxas,
I'm wondering what the real shape of the production curve will look like. As countries get past peak production, and especially then they get to Phase Two, it seems like we will be seeing more "above ground" disruption. Thus, at some point production is likely to drop more than normal decline rates would suggest.
It also seems like there will be other changes that make the model more complex. Exports will more likely to go to favored countries - ones that can provide things the country needs, like military protection, medicine, and food. Other non-favored countries may see their imports drop much more rapidly that the model would suggest.
I agree, and as I suggested down below, I suspect that the US is basically making "an offer that they can't refuse" to Iraq and Saudi Arabia, since oil prices and inventories would suggest that oil exports to Asia should be going up, while Saudi Arabia and Iraq are cutting exports to Asia.
The Neocons might argue that things are going according to plan regarding Iraq and oil exports to the US. As I have previously discussed, the flaw in their plan may be the willingness of the American military to continue to put themselves in harm's way to keep H2 Hummers well supplied.