Perhaps mainly for mental health purposes (Matt would say delusional purposes), I am arguing for Alan Drake's vision of the future--which is based on how we moved people and goods around before we really started the OIl Age.

Unfortunately, as Matt points out, current events tend to support Matt's point of view.

Jeff,

Actually, I would not call it "delusional." You are right, for mental health purposes of the vast majority of people, it is better NOT to think about this.

I have the flexibilty of being able to move anywhere I want as I have enough for a plane ticket and a year of expenses, and I can maintain my current income stream from anywhere so long as BAU continues. So for me it is at least possible to take action although as you know from our private exchanges, it is damn hard to figure out what to do.

Most do not have this flexibility. They are stuck where they are. What good would it do for their brain to digest this stuff? They can't act on the info so they would probably have a mental breakdown if they thought the way I did.

If I was not fortunate enough to have this degree of flexibility in my personal life, my brain would probably find a way to delete or deny this out of existence for my own short-term good.

This is why I haven't sent my sister a copy of Crude Awakening. She's a 27 year old teacher in San Jose. What can she do, realistically speaking, to prepare for all this?

@ the hippies: yes, yes, I know. She could grow an urban garden and hold relocalization meetups! *realistically* that's not going to amount to jack squat in her current location. San Jose is not quite as bad as Los Angeles but I think a quick look at this pic will let you know why I think relocalization efforts in the big cities are pretty pointless:

http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/postoilbulletin/mapoflosangeles.html

Edit:

Here's a satellite image of san jose circa 1994. It's twice as bad now given the development spawned by the tech boom:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/San_jose_ca_199...

There's no point in even trying to seriously prepare in such a place.

What can she do, realistically speaking, to prepare for all this?

Prepare a "Get Out Of Dodge Quick" Go-Pack?

Have an evacuation destination picked out, with multiple routes marked on maps?

Car kept in good repair and tank topped off, with a couple of full spare cans with Stab-il? Maybe also have a bicycle, in case all highways out are impassible?

Maybe cache some food, etc. at her evac site?

Just to point out that, living in a major earthquake zone, she really should do this anyway. Alan D. will confirm that this drill is (or should be) SOP for folks living in hurricane zones.

Yes, that all falls under basic diasaster prep. I have all of that stuff in spades msyelf, mostly because of the earthquake risk. She does to and even has stuff in her classroom in case the school annnounces a "security lockdown" and they are locked down in the classroom.(They've even had drills for this.)

In terms of a temporary crisis, one that lasts between 5 and 50 days, all of that can save your butt. But that's not what I'm talking about here which is a long term, permanent crisis.

Yeah, cause mankind is so fuckin dumb it'll nuke itself rather than figuring a way out of this mess. Christ, I mean, its a shared fear we all have been having for like 60 years now? But to literally say that its the most probable thing, well, it had to come only from Matt. He's the one who thinks the gov is preparing to change our genes, while creating a terminator robot (LOL) and freaks out because pres. Bush is being substituted for a day by his own vice-president... ('Doh!)

What a doomer! You beat them all, man. Keep it up. Until the bomb goes, that is!