Agreed Enviro,

However legal action and "communication" to the public of their biased policy's while claiming they are not biased is fair game.

The use of an attorney in communication is one such device even when no obvious legal remedy is apparent or worth the trouble.

This website does ban does it not. It also has rules against certain subjects etc. This site is not above what they are objecting to.

Quid Clarius Astris
Ubi Bene ibi patria

they do not claim to be unbiased anywhere on their site.

Do they claim to be biased then.

Or do they insinuate that they are unbiased.

Its one or the other isn't it. Deception by lack of terms is still deception is it not. Statements to the press and by news release will certainly not state that they are Biased do they. However do there remarks make it appear to the average reader that they wish to be balanced.

Quid Clarius Astris
Ubi Bene ibi patria

PX This is why it is hard to understand you....

? This symbol is used after a question, this one to indicate a pause and "." this one at the end of a statement.

There is a place, Their is something that belongs to them and they're always going to misunderstand your writing when you punctuate poorly and use similar but incorrect words. Do your parents know you are on their (not there) comp?

Also the big letters only go at the beginning of the sentence.

BTW the sun is brighter than the stars and you are not prospering here.

matt

Last Post G,

You are incorrect about the usage of a question mark and its need. I have posted this before and the link to the rulebook from API.

as for the rest of your personal attack ho hum.

and Matt.

The sun is a star.

Prof G. I truly do not think you wish to drive more traffic here. If you can't take this, then you truly do not want to spread the word and make this a general site. I don't think you can have it both way.

Please carry on with your work, but don't for a second believe that its fact. Its not a polemic is it.

Quid Clarius Astris
Ubi Bene ibi patria