Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Great work Stoneleigh you really out did your self with this roundup.
Though there seems to be plenty to pull from lately.
I get the feeling we are traveling to Hades in a Gucci handbag.
Regarding the story; The Great Credit Contraction of 2007
I recently watched “Money Masters” (google)
It documents how Fed created or at least exacerbated the ”Great Depression” by first inflating then contracting money.
I keep reading that this time it’s different. It is! It’s debt instead if money.
But I have a feeling that the effect will be the same if not worse.
S2
Back then it was debt too.
But it is different this time: Today $1 billion of "something" can be used as leverage to borrow $10 billion to buy "something2". Once the deal is closed, that new "something2" can be used as collatreral to buy "something3", and so on. As long as the leveraged risk can be sold to investors. That last step is new.
If you take a conservative viewpoint, and a 10-1 fractional lending rate, losing 10% of the value of your 2nd '"something" wipes out the entire value of what you started with. All equity is out the door.
The gameplan is the same: get them all in debt over their heads, and then pull the plug. Works all the time. Make crisis, then go to war.