99 comments on EROEI Short #4: Bootstrap-EROEI
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
99 comments on EROEI Short #4: Bootstrap-EROEI
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
- An interview with Stoneleigh - the case for deflation
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“We have only two modes—complacency and panic.”
—James R. Schlesinger, the first energy secretary, in 1977, on the country's approach to energy
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Bear with me while I try out a couple of analogies. Say the joules come in a tin. It's as if each time you open a new tin, you find the supplier has dipped into it themselves in order to bring it to you. And each day there's less. So you need more tins. The energy content has not diminished, it's just that more is being consumed before it gets to you.
Well you'll get back less and less. The truck collects lower-quality coal with a lesser energy payload for the thermal power station down the road, so it has to make 8 trips where 5 used to suffice in the past. And that power station is supplying the electricity to the factory that's making new trucks...
Sorry if I'm being a bit thick, but if Mr. Vail's reasoning is wrong, your argument doesn't make it clear to me as to why. It appears that what you are saying amounts to the same thing.
People just don't understand me. Listen. Less EROEI is as bad as it gets, but please, don't count it twice. A Truck that was built with a EROEI petrol of 100 will use the same energy than a truck built with a EROEI petrol of 50, 30 or 20. That's not the issue with EROEI at all. You're confusing stuff. You're saying that a truck spends the energy it requires PLUS the energy that the pumps and refineries require to function. But those are different things. The problem is how much energy does the production of ENERGY takes out of the system. If you subtract them, there's your real energy output for the society.
Well it almost would if I wasn't wrong saying what I said. The thing is, a truck spends 10 energy cubes. Imagine. You have 1000 energy cubes produced. You could have built 100 trucks. But to build those energy cubes, you required 10 energy cubes (EROEI = 100), so you can only build 99 trucks with what is left (990 cubes). If EROEI = 50, then a truck won't cost you 20cubes, but still only 10. It's the energy cost that doubled. That means that for producing 1000 energy cubes, you spent 20 cubes. That leaves 980 cubes, which goes to produce 98 trucks. Like someone above said, this doesn't have much influence until it reaches values much closer to 1 (where it reaches infinity).
But get this: the truck ALWAYS costs 10 energy cubes. Not 2X it. That's different. That's WAY different.
Okay?