China Faltering On Support For Solar Power: Report

Solar panels could generate over 10 percent of China's power by the middle of the century, but only if Beijing steps up support for pioneering generating plants and sets more ambitious targets, a report said on Wednesday.

I think someone needs to pay a very large bribe to a Chinese company so a concentrating solar thermal power plant can be built in China. I don't think the nuclear power companies want the concept recognized.

" CLAYPOOL, Ind – For a state that allegedly got into the biofuels
games late, Indiana has roared into a leadership position with the
dedication of the world's largest biodiesel production plant . Tapping
into 17 percent of the Hoosier state's total soybean production, the
$150 million Louis-Dreyfus plant is expected to produce up to 88
million gallons of biodiesel annually. The oil to be refined at the BP
Whiting plant would come from oil sands in Canada 3 x co2 Chicago needs
to turn it's fryer grease into biodesiel. The process of turning coal
into liquid fuel is realy dirty such plants are being built in U.S. $2
billion apiece, arch coal medicine bow , carbon county, Wyoming. I don't think we ever intended to end world hunger. I
think we should plant biofuel crops. and if it is solid rock desert we
should build concentrating solar thermal power plants. and it won't be
enougth, but we still shouldn't nuke Iran. "

You are talking BS. Solar power is not a competition to nuclear power, it can only complement it. Something has to power the grid at night, don't you think?

France, which gets nearly 80% of its power from nuclear plants and has never had a major accident — have made nuclear energy work, but at a high cost. The state-owned French power monopoly is severely indebted, and although France recycles its waste, it is no closer than the U.S. to approving a permanent repository. Nuclear power may consume more energy than it produces. "Even utilizing the richest ores available, a nuclear power plant must operate at ten full-load operating years before it has paid off its energy debts. And ... there is only a finite supply of supply of uranium ore containing reasonable concentrations of uranium 235. When this concentration falls below 0.01%, the costs of energy production from nuclear power can no longer cover the costs of extraction of uranium from the earth, at which time the nuclear fuel cycle will produce no net energy; below a certain uranium content, nuclear power produces less energy than is needed to build, fuel, and operate the reactor and to repair the environmental damage." (Helen Caldicott , p. 16). in the United States, the Price-Anderson Act limits the nuclear industry's liability in the event of a catastrophic accident to $9.1 billion, which is less than 2% of the $600 billion guaranteed by the Congress. In any case, $600 billion is considered to be a gross underestimate ..." (Helen Caldicott , p. 32) What does nuclear power have to do with road construction ? A doubulling of the cost for every year after the project was supposed to have been compleated.
The cost of decommissioning nuclear plants. An estimate in 2006 by the UK Treasury for the cost of decommissioning the UK's old nuclear power stations was £90 billion;
Boeing was working on salt and solar heat storage and spun it off to Pratt and Whitney who dropped it. some solar heat storage in salt exist. Some utility scale batterys exist you would just have to build a whole lot of them and have a whole lot of space to put them in. carbon nanotube long distance power lines could help too. I would say superconductor but the planet may not have enougth of the elements needed.
I think the answer is comercilized standardized parts from hundreds of companies in dozens of countries, for what I am not sure but I think it should be solar, wind has been doing rather well I think solar needs more promotion.

It is not correct to say that French nuclear power is run safely because they have not yet had a large nuclear accident. You need to look at the whole set of reactors in the world. Since the program in France is a minority of these, it is not too surprising that they have not yet had their first big accident, nor that the big accidents have happened in the countries with the largest nuclear power programs. When France does have its first big accident, they will be in a difficult spot owing to their over reliance on nuclear power. Their first big accident is probable within this century but unlikely within the lifetimes of those who made the decision to have such a large reliance on nuclear power.

Chris

What a pile of crap.

I suggest we close down the US chemical industry (or what is left of it) - by your logic it is responsible for the Bhopal disaster in India. That one killed 22,000 people - 300 times more than Chernobyl.

Your post is full of tedious statements and outright lies. It is not worthed to address them all.

Just a single reality check - EdF is NOT "severely indebted". In 2006 current liabilities amounted to 44bln euro. This compared to sales volume of 59bln. and net profit of 6bln. euro. Total assets are whopping 179bln. Full report here (PDF). A pretty decent financial shape.