![]() | DrumBeat: September 22, 2007 | The Oil Drum | Peak Oil Update - September 2007: Production Forecasts and EIA Oil Production Numbers | ![]() |
36 comments on The ASPO Conference - Final Afternoon
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
36 comments on The ASPO Conference - Final Afternoon
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
You are talking BS. Solar power is not a competition to nuclear power, it can only complement it. Something has to power the grid at night, don't you think?
France, which gets nearly 80% of its power from nuclear plants and has never had a major accident — have made nuclear energy work, but at a high cost. The state-owned French power monopoly is severely indebted, and although France recycles its waste, it is no closer than the U.S. to approving a permanent repository. Nuclear power may consume more energy than it produces. "Even utilizing the richest ores available, a nuclear power plant must operate at ten full-load operating years before it has paid off its energy debts. And ... there is only a finite supply of supply of uranium ore containing reasonable concentrations of uranium 235. When this concentration falls below 0.01%, the costs of energy production from nuclear power can no longer cover the costs of extraction of uranium from the earth, at which time the nuclear fuel cycle will produce no net energy; below a certain uranium content, nuclear power produces less energy than is needed to build, fuel, and operate the reactor and to repair the environmental damage." (Helen Caldicott , p. 16). in the United States, the Price-Anderson Act limits the nuclear industry's liability in the event of a catastrophic accident to $9.1 billion, which is less than 2% of the $600 billion guaranteed by the Congress. In any case, $600 billion is considered to be a gross underestimate ..." (Helen Caldicott , p. 32) What does nuclear power have to do with road construction ? A doubulling of the cost for every year after the project was supposed to have been compleated.
The cost of decommissioning nuclear plants. An estimate in 2006 by the UK Treasury for the cost of decommissioning the UK's old nuclear power stations was £90 billion;
Boeing was working on salt and solar heat storage and spun it off to Pratt and Whitney who dropped it. some solar heat storage in salt exist. Some utility scale batterys exist you would just have to build a whole lot of them and have a whole lot of space to put them in. carbon nanotube long distance power lines could help too. I would say superconductor but the planet may not have enougth of the elements needed.
I think the answer is comercilized standardized parts from hundreds of companies in dozens of countries, for what I am not sure but I think it should be solar, wind has been doing rather well I think solar needs more promotion.
It is not correct to say that French nuclear power is run safely because they have not yet had a large nuclear accident. You need to look at the whole set of reactors in the world. Since the program in France is a minority of these, it is not too surprising that they have not yet had their first big accident, nor that the big accidents have happened in the countries with the largest nuclear power programs. When France does have its first big accident, they will be in a difficult spot owing to their over reliance on nuclear power. Their first big accident is probable within this century but unlikely within the lifetimes of those who made the decision to have such a large reliance on nuclear power.
Chris
What a pile of crap.
I suggest we close down the US chemical industry (or what is left of it) - by your logic it is responsible for the Bhopal disaster in India. That one killed 22,000 people - 300 times more than Chernobyl.
Your post is full of tedious statements and outright lies. It is not worthed to address them all.
Just a single reality check - EdF is NOT "severely indebted". In 2006 current liabilities amounted to 44bln euro. This compared to sales volume of 59bln. and net profit of 6bln. euro. Total assets are whopping 179bln. Full report here (PDF). A pretty decent financial shape.