![]() | This Week in Petroleum 9-26-07 | The Oil Drum | Declining net oil exports--a temporary decline or a long term trend? | ![]() |
132 comments on DrumBeat: September 27, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
132 comments on DrumBeat: September 27, 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
- Some predictions on the forthcoming Russian-Ukrainian gas 'crisis'
- The US stimulus and "green jobs" for wind energy
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 13th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The infrastructure of suburbia can be described as the greatest misallocation of resources in the history of the world.”
—JH Kunstler
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
A new guest post - Modeling Oil Production to Estimate URR - Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the World - by Apparent Peak has been posted at TOD:Canada.
Figure 17: World production for crude plus condensate (seven logistics)
EIA crude oil data for Saudi Arabia (year to date for 2007):
2005: 9.6 mbpd
2006: 9.2 mbpd (-4.3%/year)
2007: 8.6 mbpd (-6.7%/year)
If Saudi Arabia were to average 9.0 mbpd in the fourth quarter, the decline rate would still be -5.6%/year.
FYI, net export decline rates (total liquids, EIA), actual for 2006 and estimated for 2007 based on year to date production and +9% increase in consumption (Rembrandt's estimate for first half):
2006: -5.5%/year
2007: -11.0%/year
WT, as usual...the net export number is definitely the one we need to fear.
As you mention, even if they increase production by 400Kbpd in 4Q (4/5ths of the quota change) they won't show an increase this year.
By May 2008, we will have 3 years of declining world oil production. When does the rear view kick in?
However, I suspect that many factors will in play in the economic, oil, food, global political arenas before we get to then.
Crude oil STILL is only 11.7 cents(US) a cup.
I like that kind of number. It makes me wonder how much cheaper that same cup has gotten in Europe and Canada this September.
Or, as Mr. Colbert put it last night:
"Our first president now has the same value as their first president, a duck."
(Canada's 1 dollar coin features a loon)
Still, I'm asking myself what both your comments have to do with the graph from Apparent Peak's article.
Mine - nothing in particular...I was responding to WT's post.
My post below and on TOD Canada refers to the Apparent peak and his logistics analysis.
The peak is just behind us (11/2005?) and the mortgage scam unwinding may allow the signal to remain mixed up in the noise for a while. I just hope we don't go into a new president 1/2009 with the administration able to hand wave and waste more time on this most pressing issue.
Posted before but here is the nice graph of just how ugly stuff gets from 1/2008 through 7/2008 on the ARM scam front.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/8/28/172611/602
WT--
OPEC numbers for KSA give averages of:
Year Production Quota
2005 9.406 8.984
2006 9.141 9.035
2007 8.552 8.587
Is the production decline due to geological limitations or due to quota declines (and part of that decline will simply be getting within the quota since they had been pumping in excess of quota)? Are the quota declines intended to mask geological limitations or because the world economies aren't crashing as OPEC thought they would in the face of $40+ oil prices, so why should OPEC sell oil this year for $70 a barrel that it could sell next year for $90?
Also, if KSA could average 9 mbpd for the last half of 2007 (its quota is 8.9), doesn't that support the argument that the declines are political, not geological?
Rick
(copy of post from TOD Canada)
Great analysis!
Your logistics analysis seems to reinforce the need for accurate URR estimates, as usual. Although, I think the lower numbers 'seem' to reflect the political realities we are witnessing.
IMO, your "APPARENT PEAK" concept has immense value and is reinforced by the realities of global interaction. The supply rate of change is slowing dramatically while the opposite is true for demand.
Even if we obtain a minor increase in production in All liquids in the next couple years...it will have to be offset by a dramatic decrease in demand BEFORE then...so the APPARENT PEAK(all liquids) is now or slightly in the past.
I haven't seen this Blog in the Oil Drum Blog listing. It may be of value.
http://netoilexports.blogspot.com/
That's the ugly graph
This graph is horrible - although most of the underlying issues will be very familiar to all us oil-nuts here at TOD this is still a very well presented powerful graphic. The spreadsheet behind it is also available (follow the link) and is very well organized and clear. I love me them well-organized spreadsheets :-)
Cuchulainn