http://science.reddit.com/info/2y8it/comments

we thank you for your support.

People don't often associate our soils with the main solution to Global Warming, but there is a growing body of evidence that cooking up agricultural WASTE could both give us a little diesel to maybe run farming, and be a "Silver Bullet" for reducing Co2 back down to safer levels. Just farming an area the size of France in this method is reputed to be able to absorb ALL Anthropogenic Greenhouse gases.

Eprida state:
The Eprida model is an international, decentralized, self supporting approach to carbon sequestration. Because making charcoal locks up carbon which can then be added to the soil, it is offers a method whereby agriculture can become a form of carbon sequestration. The machine they have developed for doing the charcoal burning basically takes 10 tons of any woody or plant biomass and turns it into 1 ton of charcoal and 3.2 tons of diesel.

See also "Black is the new Green" at Worldchanging.
http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/004815.html

And don't forget the ABC Catalyst special with Australian of the Year and Global Warming author, Tim Flannery, at the world's first International Agrichar conference.

http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s2012892.htm

Remember that this is vastly different to just storing CO2 underground where it does nobody any good and could potentially be dangerous. Instead we can convert CO2 into useful charcoal that works for us in replenishing the soil. If Agrichar can be scaled up quickly enough, then we have a chance to mitigate the worst of the CO2 emissions until fossil fuel depletion takes over at peak coal in 2025.

Why on earth are we wasting money investigating carbon capture and storage underground, when we could store it in our soils and prepare agriculture for peak oil at the same time?

Eclipse Now
Free peak oil posters to put up at your local library, university, school, or notice board.

Don't want to look for the hair in the soup, especially because I generally agree with what you are saying.

1. Either you take an area the size of France out of the presently farmed area in order to accomplish this goal (which is pol. difficult (!) in an environment of rising produce prices)

OR

2. You create new agricultural area the size of France. This is theoretically possible - just wondering tho, where are you planning on getting the water for it?

OR
3. You could create a Carbon Tax in Kind (i.e. payment to be paid in carbon) to be placed on all agriculture and then systematically build up the soils of run down areas with the procedes...

I could continue my comments, BUT..
btw, wouldn't this post be more appropriate on a drumbeat?
Cheers, Dom
---
Just remember the Golden Years, all you at the top!

The great thing about the EPRIDA model of production is that it DOES NOT take land out of production-- it actually makes the land more productive, by generating carbon negative fertilizer to go along with the biofuels:

http://www.eprida.com/home/index.php4

So, not only do you sequester carbon, you do it in a way that makes the soil more productive, long term, and frees farmers from the need to buy fertilizers generated with fossil fuels. The Amazonians were doing this thing 4000 years ago, just not generating the biofuels along with it.

Yes, terra preta was and is a great method.
A real silver bullet.
I'm quite curious how modern man will screw this one up.

(who, me? negative? naaaaaaaa......)