298 comments on Prepping for Peak: How Fast Can We Change?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
298 comments on Prepping for Peak: How Fast Can We Change?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- What "Lower Consumption" Means
- Tricking and Treating the Future
- Meeting Energy Decline Part-Way - Potatoes?
TOD:Europe
- The Future of Nuclear Energy: Facts and Fiction - Part IV: Energy from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion?
- The US stimulus and "green jobs"
- EROWI - energy return of water invested
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Saturday 7th November 2009
- The Bullroarer - Friday 30th October 2009
- Details of Solar Flagships Released
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- The Energy Blog
- Entropy Production
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“The aim of every political constitution is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society; and in the next place, to take the most effectual precautions for keeping them virtuous whilst they continue to hold their public trust.”
—James Madison, FEDERALIST #57 (1787)
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Robert, your lifestyle and mine are scarily similar (with my wife having the same comments, no doubt).
Yes, the loss of billions of lives is horrible to think about, and I would also prefer to think that such a situation will not unfold. I'm not optimistic about it, however, given the decline in natural gas and phosphorous in North America (further reducing grain exports, likely to zero). China is artificially supported by a robust economy; a recession would have serious impacts on their ability to support their population. Other Asia populations are in a similar situation. Africa is already struggling and the combination of peak oil and climate change is extremely concerning.
your lifestyle and mine are scarily similar (with my wife having the same comments, no doubt).
Count me in the same boat. Not all people can shower in 6L of water and tolerate or like cooler water or live the relatively low energy life we live.
But I question being able to cut my own consumption in half. In the winter my high-eff furnace is responsible for something like 50% of our electricity use. Yes lowering the home temperature (family members already complain about wearing an undershirt, shirt, sweater and being cold at 21C - what can I say a side effect of a vegetarian diet is that you loose a lot of body fat!) is possible; but not by 1/2 and have the home liveable. Although I do know people who keep their house around 60F (what 16C) in the daytime and cooler at night I could not tolerate it unless I was working (and I don't mean typing at a keyboard)!
Our electric water heater is about 1.5kWh/day - 1/5 of our total electricity use and we don't wash in hot but it would not be easy going down to 1/2 of our energy use.
Having embraced Voluntary Simplicity our TV is already relegated to the basement and the stereo system is gone.
The car is pretty well only necessary for convience and hauling the kids around (playing the game of racing between work and preschool to pick them up on time ..) - but it is 1/3 of our total personal carbon emisssions so it's something we could easily give up.
But there are tons of fuzzies. Sure we're got enough saved to last around 15 years without having to work; but what's going to happen to our savings? Hyperinflation? What's going to happen to our taxes (home taxes are about 1/6 of our total living expenses) and how much will it cost to repair the roof / furnace over such a time frame?