Alan, thanks for the snapshot peek. Your $250 to $300/barrel at any point in the future seems unanticipated. Perhaps I'm just naive but wouldn't demand destruction preclude that? Thanks for all your hard work.

From informal verbal discussions (i.e. NOT from the horse's mouth), they anticipate a spike to $250 to $300/barrel which results in about -5% GDP shrinkage. This demand destruction allows oil to drop below $200/barrel and a +2% GDP rebound the following year. This in turn leads to +$200/barrel prices and stagnant economic growth thereafter as oil becomes scarcer and more expensive.

I try, with limited success, to reduce oil demand faster than depletion via higher efficiency and substitution. In the Colin Campbell world, it is a close race ! In the Jeffrey Brown ELM world, I would likely lose (not yet modeled).

The default oil conservation strategy, if all else fails, is reduced economic activity. In the ELM world, I strongly suspect that all the EOT efforts would do is reduce the rate of economic shrinkage and provide a non-oil transportation base with which to one day rebuild the economy around.

Best Hopes,

Alan