30 comments on Questions and Answers on Energy Issues
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
30 comments on Questions and Answers on Energy Issues
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Unique Times -- and the Future
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- The Bullroarer - Friday 27th November 2009
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.”
—Gandhi
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
In another comment, I was wondering if anyone had done an investigation of furans (or HMF) as organic feedstocks.
If we are willing to overlook the inefficiency of photosynthesis, furans generally have the following advantages:
It seems there were a couple articles on them floating around last spring, but no real analysis of the energy inputs. Some midwestern graduates students had discovered a process for hydrogentating them, as I recall (hydrogen being an obvious energy input).
| The problem will solve itself.
| But not in a nice way.
RR--As a non-technical visitor to The Oil Drum, I daresay your new approach to writing is more satisfying to me as a reader. You collect questions of interest to you and respond to them rather comprehensively instead of responding to this criticism and that piecemeal. You feel less fragmented and diverted from your family. I feel like I get more benefit from your expertise. Win-Win from my perspective.
I now know what holds up butanol as a fuel source when before I never quite understood.
HMF is a product of the maillard reaction (aka browning food)
it's mutagenic as well. (not sure if its more or less toxic than gasoline)
It could be fuel source, but this is basically a direct conversion of sugars into a fuel. We all know about where this is going. The wiki says that cellulose and starch can be used, but breaking down cellulose is still the big problem. (seriously if we could break down cellulose efficiently it would be nice!)
furthermore the wiki on furalfural notes it explosively decomposes above 250C. it's also pretty toxic.
Thanks, I read the wiki articles. I was hoping RR knows more about the subject than WikiPedia. And is willing to write about it.
Thanks for the lead. I drew some wood gas through water and wondered what could have condensed in it...furans, acetals and tar-like compounds seemingly. Methane, hydrogen and carbon oxides would have passed through without condensing. A giant bong or water pipe could maybe collect serious amounts.
I note the EPA listed furan along with dioxin as an unacceptable pollutant at a proposed new paper mill nearby.