178 comments on The Connection Between Food Supply and Energy: What Is the Role of Oil Price?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
178 comments on The Connection Between Food Supply and Energy: What Is the Role of Oil Price?
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Search The Oil Drum with Google
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
TOD:Europe
- Peak Gold, Easier to Model than Peak Oil? - Part I
- Carbon Capture and Storage
- Oilwatch Monthly November 2009
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- International Energy Agency calls 'Peak' on OECD Oil Demand
- Australian Senate: Peak Oil motion defeated 31:6
- The Bullroarer - Friday 20th November 2009
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Pessimism of the Intellect; Optimism of the Will.”
—Antonio Gramsci
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Nate Hagens, Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Engineer-Poet, Heading Out, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Campfire: Glenn, Jason Bradford
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:Canada: benk, Libelle
- TOD:ANZ: Big Gav, Phil Hart, aeldric
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Nice analysis of the energy used by modern agriculture. However, the ag inputs are only part of the story. There are some good summaries of the total amount of energy used in the food system in the literature (e.g. Smil, Vaclav, 1991, General Energetics, John Wiley & Sons). It seems clear that the agricultural inputs are in the range of 1/4 of the total, with the remainder being energy used in the storage, transportation, distribution, marketing, and preparation of food. Meat production is perhaps an order of magnitude more energy-intensive than grain and bean production. Eating less meat and eating more locally-grown, in-season, foods will save a lot of energy.
Here are some links to data on the U.S. food system:
http://www.energyfarms.net/node/1389
Looks to me like the total food system consumes about 10% of U.S. energy use, with on farm consumption (including embedded energy in fertilizer, pesticides, tractor fuel, etc.) about 1/4 to 1/5 of that 10%.
The most energy intensive part of the U.S. food system is actually home storage and preparation.
I have been learning a lot about grain production lately as working to sow wheat. Conventional grain yields are incredible (about 6000 lbs/acre of wheat in CA) and I don't expect to approach those with our organic, low energy, dryland methods. And, we need to rotate fields with cover crops to put nitrogen back in. So, I expect yields half to a quarter of conventional when sown, and to only grow wheat half the time. In total then, I expect to get a quarter to an eighth of the yield for a given area over the long term.
But, I do expect to have a very positive net energy!
As a food engineer, let me tell you this is the case. something like 4.3 trillion dollars of food are turned over in the USA per year. Food goes into plant one place, comes out as prepared meals, canned goods, meats at another. Obviously different plants for different products, but usually we are constrained by a large problem:
Keep the water content as high as possible. (sell the rubes as little real food as possible)
Keep the weight down. As water is the #1 component of foods, this is in direct conflict with the above point. Less weight means less volume and cheaper transport!
You would be both surprised and disgusted by the amount of water shipped in packaged foods across the country.