At the risk of seeming naive, just how is it that some holdings can be 'off balance sheet' ? What meaning does a balance sheet have if it doesn't include all the factors? I assumed that the Enron debacle had put some serious curbs on this practice, but it defies my logic how companies can have some cards on the table and others off.

Seems like the US government is doing the same thing with military spending being off its sheet too. The more I see of the financial system's workings, the more I see its unravelling being a good thing - except that it probably won't be fixed but just reinitiated under a different name. Whatever happened to Arthur Anderson Inc - did it become Abstrivia or some such?

There are many shades of Enron in the current situation. You would think that lessons would have been learned, but apparently not. Keeping assets off balance sheet - in SIVs for instance - has been a very common practice in recent years.

And that is a big part of the problem. Its been " but mom everyone else is doing it" for so long that the curruption and deception has pretty much come to be tragically expected by so may people and institutions. John