49 comments on This Week in Petroleum 12-5-07
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
49 comments on This Week in Petroleum 12-5-07
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Advanced search
Support The Oil Drum
Recently on TOD:World
TOD:Campfire
- Politics and Peak Energy
- How do we maintain adequate phosphorus and potassium levels for crops?
- What should we do with funds set aside for retirement?
TOD:Europe
TOD:Canada
- In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!
- The Round-Up: October 24, 2008
- Compressed Air Energy Storage - How viable is it?
TOD:Australia/NZ
- Electric Vehicles: The End Of Australian Manufacturing ?
- Upcoming Forum In Sydney: 'Peak Oil - Is this the end of civilisation as we know it ?'
- From Counterculture To Cyberculture: The Life And Times Of Stewart Brand
TOD:Net Energy
Blogroll
Energy Sites
- The Coming Global Oil Crisis
- Die Off
- Dry Dipstick
- Energy Bulletin
- From the Wilderness
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Peak Oil Crisis
- Peak Oil News and Message Boards
- Powerswitch
- Rigzone
- Matthew Simmons
- Wolf at the Door
Environment & Sustainability Sites
- The Daily Green
- EcoGeek
- Eco Street
- Green Car Congress
- Green Options
- green.alltop.com
- Gristmill
- RealClimate
- Sustainablog
- Treehugger
- WorldChanging
Blogs
- Casaubon's Book
- Cleantech Blog
- Clusterf
k Nation (Jim Kunstler) - The Cost of Energy
- David Strahan
- Early Warning
- The Energy Blog
- European Tribune
- GraphOilology
- Health After Oil
- jeffvail.net
- Mobjectivist
- Peak Energy (Australia)
- Peak Energy (USA)
- R-Squared
- Resource Insights
Finance & Economics Blogs
- The Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- The Crash Course
- Ecological Economics
- Econbrowser
- Environmental Economics
- Infectious Greed
- The Mess That Greenspan Made
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
Organizations
Peak Oil Primers
Beware email scams!
Beware email scams claiming to be from this site. We do not have any job openings. If anyone contacts you about a job at The Oil Drum, do not reply to them, and definitely do not give them any personal information or send them money. Read more here.
“Pessimism of the Intellect; Optimism of the Will.”
—Antonio Gramsci
User login
Contact
- Content: editors at theoildrum dot com
- Tech support: support at theoildrum dot com
Personnel
- Editors: Gail the Actuary, Prof. Goose
- DrumBeat Editor: Leanan
- Contributors: ace, Dave Murphy, Engineer-Poet, Glenn, Heading Out, Jason Bradford, jeffvail, JoulesBurn, Nate Hagens, Sam Foucher, Robert Rapier
- TOD:Europe: Chris Vernon, Euan Mearns, Francois Cellier, Jerome a Paris, Luís de Sousa, Rembrandt, Rune Likvern, Ugo Bardi
- TOD:ANZ: aeldric, Big Gav, Phil Hart
- Emeritus: Stuart Staniford
- Technician: Super G
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.










GAIA Host Collective
Hmmm... an 8 million barrel decline in crude inventories?
and a 4 miilion increase in gasoline, so it takes 2 barrels of crude to make 1 of gasoline, sounds about right.
Especially if that crude is a bit sour...makes sense?
Yeh, one would think from just the headline data that we burned through 8 million barrels of crude to make the 4 million barrels of gasoline...
But the report said:
Then later said:
The top part referenced last week, the last part is YOY.
It looks to me like we ramped up our imports of gasoline over this period by a tad over 4M, and lost 8M barrels of crude inventory. Its not clear to me where this is in the report.
What really confuses me is that given the antics of the market over the last couple of hiccups, this one gets ignored. What would have sent oil a couple of weeks ago well over $100, today gets ho-hummed and dropped another buck or two to $87 as I type this. Its like the neighbor's car alarm that keeps going off in the middle of the night - its just making noise. Go back to sleep.
The Saudis handled this one well. I think the market was afraid SA had hit their geological production limit. Just one rumor from them about a production hike - backed up by Petrologistics reports of increased tanker activity - and oil plummets.
What makes it even worse is our Government's take on increasing taxation of our energy infrastructure when they need the money for their increased costs of expanding the infrastructure for processing ever more heavy sour crudes and developing marginal reservoirs.
Its my belief that people think we are crying wolf, when there is no wolf - only profits. I believe many scientists here have seen the wolf, but everytime they point it out, others hide it because they don't want the ensuing panic of proof of a bona-fide indestructible wolf in the midst of their flocks.
But then, I am a scientist too, and have known enough scientists to know their motivations are different from, say, the managerials - who use different weightings in what they think is important.
Steve
Cushing inventory levels are what?
Anyone know?
Has anyone ever seen an 8 million bbl drawdown?
As refinery utiization is still below 90.
Cushing is up at 15.9. Seems that the big draws were on the Gulf Coast (PADD III): from 159.7 to 153.8. On the East Coast (PADD I) a draw too: from 16.8 to 14.7.
Cushing up 0.7 by EIA