95 comments on Peak Oil, Peak Food, Peak Risk
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
95 comments on Peak Oil, Peak Food, Peak Risk
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
| Show without comments | PDF version
Google search
Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Personnel
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
There are many levels of peak oil discussions. Adaptation and mitigation mean different things to different individuals, communities and nations. Corn ethanol is a waste of precious time and resources on a national scale. If economies were more localized, they could take advantage of local conditions and some biofuels might make sense.
And why do we need to plow? Certainly for large scale industrial ag, this increases yields, but aren't there no-till methods, even for large fields?
To get rid of weeds!
Siwmae (Hiya) Nate,
We don't need to plough (and all the subsequent soil cultivation that follows), of course. That’s an option, not an essential. And for those who choose to grow food that way, draft animals are an excellent, ancient, proven, and still highly practical power source.
The above statements are not just drawn out of the air, but are the result of much practical experience, my own, plus that of a big crowd of very much more authoritative others.
My own current experience is instructive. I’m a member of a CSA (community-supported agriculture) scheme; and also I run my own small permaculture operation, which is still in a state of expansion as I continue to learn.
On the farm, we use tractor-tillage. On my place I use no-till methods. Both are organic operations, of course. May I assure urban and suburban readers of these notes that the viability and the productivity of these operations, very typical of lots of grassroots initiatives which are now beavering away, getting started and making their way up the essential early learning curves, are in no way fatally dependent on the ultra-cheap-energy, fossil-hydrocarbon syndrome. Most seem to be using that facility, whilst it’s still widely viable. But the people involved are – usually, it seems to me – at the cutting-edge of awareness not only about the petro-energy crisis, but crucially of the wider, all-engulfing, inter-linked global crises of which it’s part.
We’re making it our – practical! – business to be ready when the fuel famines strike. We aim to have food and other essentials available for ourselves and for our neighbours, at least in survival quantities, despite the oncoming chaos of bigbiz commercial agriculture and food-retailing.
Rather than go on at length about this here, may I offer the two links below, which are densely-packed with practical, time-proven wisdom about these matters. These sites typify many such operations, which can be found easily enough with due diligence. Robert Denlinger and Dave Blume know their stuff from way back, are constant, practical (that word again) commercially-viable practioners of their craft, and are two of very many living proofs chugging quietly along in the undergrowth, out of the attention of big media, big biz and big politics, that another way is possible. Not only possible, but happening.
As a great bonus, from my personal viewpoint, Robert also protects his livestock, as I do on a much smaller scale (no wolves, bears or jackals in Britain, for the time being; back soon, I hope), with our wonderful, beloved shepherd dogs. Typically, Robert has recorded zero stock losses to predators since he got his first two shepherd dogs, the Kuvasz sisters Capella and Callisto, some years back.
http://www.permaculture.com/drupal/node/141
http://www.denstarfarm.us/
Incidentally, Dave Blume is FAMOUSLY very hot on farm-scale ethanol production for home use, as is Danny Day and the Eprida initiative. Google 'em!
Hwyl fawr (Cheers!), Rhisiart Gwilym
re-posted below
No-till? No plowing?
Around here in W. Ky we do a huge amount of no-till HOWEVER not all land and soil types are viable via no-till. So we have equipment that can do both..Planters ,etc.
However ,once more, we do use a large variety of tillage equipment. For instance subsoilers,chisel plows, paravanes , rolling harrows and more.
Creek bottom vs river bottom vs hill ground vs whatever. Each has a differing manner of cultivation and genetics as far as seed varieties and planting dates. It is very complex.
I rarely see a set of bottom plows here. Most are rusting away but there are surely large areas of the USA where no-till is impractical for some reason. Here we use it on hill ground else it would erode rapidly.
On flat ground or very low grades you don't have such problems.
Its not 'one size fits all'.
Speaking of 'plowing' is not very precise.
And you don't get rid of weeds by plowing. Also plowing , real plowing tends to leave a very large area of dry matter between the top of the soil and the subsoil. An area that prevents good water utilization and possible root penetration. More like a layer of insulation.
Chisel plowing is preferrable due to its not disturbing the surface of the soil but it takes an enormous amount of tractor power. Paravaning I have seen but am not that familiar with.
airdale